Hidden Truth Show with Jim Breslo
Hidden Truth Show with Jim Breslo
Jim Breslo
Reviews
via Podcasts
Started off good but…..
Show is too political 👎🏽
OGMUDBONE123
Great Podcast
I love the topics and always has great guests.
Trucker10220
Episode 104
White privilege and an Asian who wants to be treated like a white man. This show is pure garbage!!!!!
1904 Tito
God
Jim gets stuck on the Big Bang which was an event, sound. It’s not a being, it’s obvious that Jim is no scientist. Getting the guests book, second time a smart person has proven that God exist. Too bad Jim keeps asking dumb questions, still a good interview.
maxzen2004
Weak conspiratorial garbage.
I love fringe stuff but there is way too much right leaning conspiracy wack stuff here, major eyerolls.
Black Magick
I Unsubscribed
Deep dive? More like a cannonball into the shallow end. The more I listened to these the more irritated I was with the host, Jim Breslo. I made it through one and a half of his “deep dives” because I often liked the interviewees and he initially struck me as genuinely curious (although a bit ill-informed and biased). It is difficult for him to get past ideas he’s latched onto. Sure that’s human but while he clearly sees himself as highly objective, he isn’t searching wide eyed and humbly for a “hidden truth.” He’s usually already found and largely made up his mind about what he’s reckoned true. These biases become glaring when he gets a guest on who shares his view and he excitedly prattles in incredulity criticizing what previous guests have said or believe. In the September 10, 2018 episode with Aydin Olson-Kennedy titled TRANS: “Do Not Fear Reassignment Surgery, You Can Always Transition Back,” Breslo’s biases and ill-preparedness are glaring: Starting at 00:20:40 of that episode, Olson-Kennedy disagrees with breslo and tries to engage in discussion. Breslo stutters a bit and slightly raises his voice to say “WELL, I mean we don’t need to get into those precise details but maybe we will later…” I thought this was a deep dive but you’re not going to get into precise details???? Olson-Kennedy again states his disagreement with Breslo’s statement, very clearly, and backs it up with examples of his experience. Breslo responds – “Yeah, well, yeah, we could get into that debate” and proceeds to make mention of studies and experts that back up his assertion that childhood trauma causes people to be transgender. At 00:25:48 Breslo refers to ‘most experts’ backing up his point of view. The interviewee calmly but alertly queries, “What experts?” Breslo sounds caught with his pants down, nervously explaining “Just generally speaking, I’m not going to cite somebody right now…” A ‘deep dive’ full of assumptions, biases and generalizations and a refusal to make citations. He keeps referring to Olson-Kennedy as having far more expertise and experience than he does on this topic but will not entertain the possibility that Olson-Kennedy’s argument might be more accurate than those who promote what Breslo has already decided is true. Olsen-Kennedy interrupts saying, “But if you’re going to put something forth like that, I actually think that you do have an accountability to cite it.” Breslo manages to move on without citing the experts to whom he is referring. Deep dive? Really? In his recap, Breslo referred to this interview as difficult. No, not really, he just had an interviewee who knew his topic very well, spoke with pointed confidence, and held Breslo to the same standard – Breslo fell short. He consistently falls short.
Read more
Meadowfence
Great podcast re Intelligent Design
Jim has some great subjects he covers...just needs to stop asking leading questions. Dr. Meyer explained it well for even a layman like myself to understand...also just ordered his book.
Cajun4Liberty
Breslo was out of his depth
Steven Meyer ran circles around the pompous “all knowing” Breslo. It’s quite obvious Breslin had a presupposition characteristic of those without an expansive mind. Breslo would have come to the same conclusion that Meyer did only by an active agent supplanting it in his mind. He and this podcast isn’t worthy of hosting a brilliant mind such as Steven Neyer. Mr. Meyer, thank you for allmming it wit Breslo, a clearly unworthy host with no depth of mind or presence. Find another podcast, Breslo is as good as the news you watch every day....uneducated and built on fallacy!!
Read more
Acevcp714
Disinformation
Lots of disinformation and gaslighting. I enjoyed the entire chapters/pieces on the Vegas massacre but everything else is straight garbage... borderline racist at time; lots of disinformation that’s easily proven false but never pushed back upon or asked follow ups. I would be careful listening to anything he has to say or push regarding trump, Obama, covid, or the like. It’s clear he has an agenda. Active spreader of lies and disinformation , but why and to what end? I truly don’t know, but it’s as clear as other ultright things
Read more
rickross183
Jeffrey Epstein apologists. Alan Dershowitz defenders. Pretty terrible people, in my opinion.
Great podcast if you like defenders of pedophilia. I’m not a fan, so this podcast isn’t for me.
RogerDodger421
Incorrect information
The information that the host gives in the interview concrning trans girls competing in sports is incorrect and inflammatory. The host states that trans women can compete in the olympics if they are on Hormone blockers. That is only part of the story and he has skipped the rest. The part he skipped. The levels that their hormones need to be at to compete is monitored. He says it is for ciswomen but not trans women. This is totally incorrect. My fear is that it is purposefully incorrect.
Read more
Drew in Utah
Mixed Feelings
I’m currently getting to the end of the first season - Vegas Shooter. I was excited to see a series on a subject that seems to lack any media attention. Like many other listeners have stated, the host can be extremely rude to his guests. Often interrupting them, or talking down to them. You can hear the annoyance in the guest’s tone at times. He also seems rather biased, often arguing with guests that don’t suit his agenda. I really enjoy the information given, which allows me to conduct my own research. Content wise, there’s obviously a lot of work and time put into this series. I appreciate that. I’m hoping as I continue through the other series, some of the issues mentioned above are handled better. Less importantly, but still something worth mentioning - sound quality. It seems inconsistent throughout, and mouth noises are heard constantly. Pretty annoying, as it distracts from the conversation at times.
Read more
idraculateyourface
this show is ridiculous
arguments like “it is hot in Florida but there isn’t drought...therefore climate change is a lie propagated by BLM. I know because I have friends with PHDs”
shd345
lost the plot
where this show was once interesting, thought provoking, and often challenging, it’s slowly turned toward trite drivel. the topics covered as of late, and the guests brought on, seem to be pushing a direct agenda. i tried to stick with this in hopes of compelling ideas and conversations, but i fear those days are now over and never to return
hhausted
Great
But stop interrupting your guests constantly
DaveC304
Cover the Epstein case with some HONESTY
This is the 2ND episode you’ve had guest on who are essentially enablers. You guest tonight didn’t mention the fact that Dershowitz has openly admitted he has received massages at Epstein’s Palm Beach home...he justified it by saying “I kept my underwear on”...your guest didn’t mention that....because she appears to be a a Dershowitz sycophant... How about the INSANE sweetheart sentencing deal he got for him in Palm Beach??? Didn’t touch on that?? Why not? Then we go into victim shaming/blaming one of the survivors? Why isn’t her buddy Dershowitz suing her for libel ?? I’d LOVE to see the discovery phase of that lawsuit which will never happen. Bobby Capucci’s Jeffrey Epstein Show podcast is could have an absolute hay-day on inaccuracies your guest pushed on this episode. The content on this episode was so maligned it ALMOST feels like a PR stunt by Dershowitz or Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal team. This is NOT good Epstein content. Your guest isn’t being forthright. Leave the Epstein coverage to the real experts like Whitney Webb and Bobby Capucci.... this is little more than propaganda and narrative manipulation
Read more
Cewoodford
Hogwash
I’m all for freedom of speech but what a cost to pay with dreck like this. CO-VID 19 is running wild in Brazil. Hot weather doesn’t stop it.
FilmsforLife
AA 2018 - incorrect info
Mistaken info given right off the bat. AA and NA are not the same.
DebJoy101
Such BS
Supposed expert Dr. Shiva is full of fact errors and self agrandizing. Host offers no critical comments, and lets the BS flow. Show on Bill Gates is another twisted piece. The notion that truth is hidden plays to the fear, paranoia, and uncertainty of the COVID era. This moderator has zero credentials and has proven Brandolinis Law..... Why cant this dummy understand that longer sequestering yields fewer deaths? And that this specific deadly virus is NOT the normal seasonal flu? Listen to experts and avoid this source of nonsense like the plague...
Read more
MXPGJW
Not good!
The interviewer has a hard time letting his guest talk.. he’s constantly interrupting them.
westward inc.
Nimitz encounters
Love the show and just found it on Amazon Prime. Thank you for all you do.
Meme4one
Epstein
The content is good information. Some of the guest speakers weren’t really talking much facts I don’t think. Especially the Lucifer dude. I hope this doesn’t get covered up bc there is a lot of high up/famous people that need to be brought to light for what they are.
texasstaff
Episode 4
I mean episode 4 is pretty pathetic and non factual.
suzyschwartzz
Excellent show! 😝
Excellent guest and topics. The host also doesn’t shy away from asking the tough questions and focusing on facts. A good blend of science and deep state politics
Fame_O
Needs to vet his guests better
I thought some of these guests would have something intelligent to add until they deviate from the reason they were asked onto the show and start forcing their personal political bias on the listeners. Really tired of that. If I want that then I’ll listen to a political podcast.
Peanutlabdog
Pretty Good
It’s a pretty good series on Epstein. Whether or not it’s a true deep dive can be debated. In the beginning, the most annoying aspect was Michael speaking in the background not miced up. You know we can’t hear a single thing he said, right? The best episode was the one with the reporter from Ohio. I learned a lot from that episode but not a lot from others.
Eriu68
Really?!?
Listened to one episode. Couldn’t even make it to the end. So stupid!
mcdjoh
The worst
I was looking forward to the Epstein series but couldn’t get past the 1st episode. Sloan Bella may do some great work but she is awful to listen to and is a total idiot. I will not be listening any more episodes. Just terrible!!!!
mamashugs
Mostly good
This podcast tackles some relevant news stories and topics, and Jim Breslo gets a number of interesting guests from different sides of the issue. The Las Vegas shooting series is still the strongest, but the transgender series also presented important sides of the topic, and it’s not Jim’s fault that certain experts refused to answer questions fully or come back to follow up. Production quality is inconsistent, and the mics pick up a lot of mouth noises, thumping on tables, etc., so it’s sometimes challenging to listen to. However I don’t notice Jim interrupting guests that much; it seems to be them interrupting him just as often, or sometimes a delay on Skype or whatever they’re using. The one episode I do NOT recommend is the “Epstein was a Mossad agent” waste of time. That guest is an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist who does not deserve an audience. Normally I appreciate Hidden Truth bringing a range of perspectives, but Jew hating is not something anybody needs to hear more about.
Read more
Jill457
Lame
Some of these guest are the stupidest I’ve heard. He also injects his own opinion to the point it obstructs the interview. He also has an annoying way of badgering the question such as he’d did with his MJ guest.
Vintagegamer1984
Episode 30 is very disrespectful
I am a survivor of route 91 and just found this podcast The cab driver laughing and saying how cool it was is beyond upsetting. Please remove that episode. If any of my survivor family hears that it will be very disturbing
gcommur
Jim Breslo
He’s a racist ..if you don’t believe me go to episode 4 “worst president in history “ then come tell me I’m wrong .
guy gone mad
Waste of time
Poor quality audio. Poor quality guest.
meltonelton
The truth is sometimes hard
A great show talking about subjects many rather not hear about after all to do so might make one rethink what they believe can’t have that
Indy Film Wisconsin
More like Hidden Lies
For a guy who claims he is looking for the truth he often injects his own opinion. He is nasty and he interjects his own opinion. Facts be damned. His sarcasm and tone makes this a terrible podcast to listen to. I literally giggled with glee deleting this nonsense from my life. Don’t get suckered into another fool telling you he has the “truth “ when he offers nothing more than his own BS. Not for me. I listened to the episode about MJ. He wasn’t even trying to listen to the other side. Even believing for a moment that MJ could actually be innocent, which i believe he is. Ugh. His voice drips with sarcasm even when he doesn’t have one fact and Charles Thompson actually does. Don’t download please. Save your time for others who make no pretense of loving truth. This AINT it. Zero stars.
Read more
supermodel
“Truth” is just his opinion- might as well watch the news.
Host/interviewer interrupts his guests so much so that it’s completely exhausting. Shut and and listen to what people are saying! Why do you have the experts on if you just try to discredit everything they’re saying and act like you’re the expert? No matter what side of the aisle you’re on, this guy is obnoxious. Yuck.
mama_sooz_
It’s American!
I think people who don’t like what he’s got to say shouldn’t listen. This type of show shouldn’t be banned. A lot of people can’t stand to hear another side on these issues. They don’t want equal rights for all, they want special rights just for them. No one is telling them they can’t be gay or trans. Deal with it, we all have to hear all your pro-trans and pro-gay rhetoric constantly. This show exposes the good, bad and ugly on controversial issues. Let’s cast a bright light on these things and hear all sides. If you want to hear what your comfortable hearing go turn on Rachel Maddow. KPO
Read more
Paul6062
Con-man
anti-gay bigot con-man, his gay and trans stuff is a hate crime, should be pulled by itunes
keaautom
Conspiracy, not full fact
I love the show for the subject matter, topics, and speed of discussion...but the show does have an agenda. The show is heavily biased and conspiracy minded rather than objective and factual. The questions asked by the host are to validate, further, or spark controversy where they isn’t always any and that’s a bit frustrating to listen to when you want real questions to be asked. That’s my only complaint about the show. The title is pretty fitting when you view it from that perspective “Hidden Truth”, is it hidden because you don’t believe the facts and would rather read between the lines and make things fit your narrative...or have we really been told a lie? Good car ride material but don’t get sucked into this rabbit hole.
Read more
Aly29362
Thank you!!
Jim talks to people on both sides of this issue with honesty, respect and true interest in understanding. He talks with guests about topics and questions I have about this issue that I’m too afraid to bring up. This series had been intriguing and enlightening. THIS is the type conversation we all need to be allowed to have!
Rcourtney
Creepy announcer
What is with the creepy, whispering intro? I have listen to a couple of episodes and it seems good, but give up the X Files theme.
Annoyed mom13
Don’t interrupt
Please stop interrupting your guests so much during interviews. It’s really frustrating to listen to.
Love snowboard game
Not your average podcast!
Great work on the Las Vegas shooting and continued coverage on developing details! The current topic of transgenders is provocative as well!
iPhattMatt
Season 1 was fine, season 2 is unlistenable
Season 1 made great sense, dig deeper into the Las Vegas shooting. Season two tho: the truth behind the transgender movement. Jim’s biases are so blatant by his guest selection and lines of questioning. Several of his guests he has to defend, as they’ve been (fairly) called hate-groups. Each of his guests against this “movement” are self proclaimed “ conservative Christians.” Oh. And he says “and” in the most annoying way possible.
Read more
pyro bob baby
Great podcast - definitely a great one to subscribe to!
I LOVE how its "truth" driven and has something for everyone. Very informative and the type of podcast that any political background will enjoy....far left...far right...in the middle. Something for everyone to learn.
SFTreat13
More interested in conspiracies than getting to any truth
I tried my best to give this podcast a fair shake, but it is unlistenable. The poor audio alone can make it hard enough to listen to, but the topics grasping for some government involvement or consistency involving the police department make it a ridiculous grasp at sensationalizing the event even more. I agree that some of the handling of the incident was chaotic, but how can someone judge the LVMPD for the confusion that was had while the incident was happening. No one could possibly plan for this to have happened, so why such negative bashing of the police? I think the podcast wants so badly for there to be some government conspiracy that they flat out refuse to acknowledge that bad people are capable of doing bad things.
Read more
Jessie LaFollette
No real investigation
You obviously didn’t listen to any of the 911 calls or watch the PD cam footage. This is a major coverup and we probably will never know the real truth!!
Butterfly-01
James Garbarino
Worst guest liked the series before him.. unsubscribing now done with this series
MAGA 2020
Episode:(Newly released documents)
Andrew is incorrect in that we DO know the motive for Charles Whitman, he left a note behind requesting that his brain be checked out, in which they did indeed find a tumor. Strange how In 27 years with the FBI behavioral science, yet he missed that little tidbit?
TimD.1
Shill
It’s obvious after listening to all of these shows that the host is a shill for Las Vegas and doesn’t ask questions fairly he must be paid by the casinos. This is controlled opposition
Dadddy1962
Load more