When Prosecutors Keep Mum
Published April 1, 2017
53 min
    Add to queue
    Copy URL
    Show notes
    In 1985, eight men were convicted of the grisly murder of a Washington D.C. woman. After spending decades in prison, they learned from an article in the Washington Post that prosecutors had withheld evidence from trial that could have exculpated them. This week, the Supreme Court delved back into the details of the 30-plus year old murder case and considered whether the case should be reopened. Former defense lawyer Thomas Dybdahl is writing a book about the murder and its aftermath, and joins us to discuss Turner v. USand Overton v. US.

    We also speak with legal scholar Lori Ringhand, who literally wrote the book on Supreme Court confirmation hearings. She reflects on some of the ways the process has evolved over the years, whether the so-called “Ginsburg rule” is appropriately named, and what purpose these hearings actually serve. 

    Transcripts of Amicus are available to Slate Plus members, several days after each episode posts. For a limited time, get 90 days of free access to Slate Plus in the new Slate iOS app. Download it today at slate.com/app.

    Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook. Our email is amicus@slate.com

    Podcast production by Tony Field. Our intern is Camille Mott. 

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
        0:00:00 / 0:00:00