In this Season 1 finale the question of "Can a search be allowed without consent?" is answered, while also keeping the 4th amendment in mind. 

Ladies and Gentlemen, this week our favorite lawyer returns to discuss the Exclusionary Rule and Truth in Evidence. These upcoming series of episodes were inspired by a question sent in to [email protected] pertaining to evidence found in a warrantless search. Cases mentioned on this weeks episode listed below. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)

Ladies and Gentlemen, this week we discuss the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act and and how YOU can be protected! Andre also discusses his experience in cases where provisions in this Act were violated. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&division=3.&title=1.5.&part=4.&chapter=3.&article=

Ladies and Gentlemen, this week's episode was inspired from a question sent in to [email protected]. The question is in regards to providing a bilingual lease agreement, but we discuss more than just that this week. Listed below were sections discussed on this week's show. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1941.&lawCode=CIV https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1942.&lawCode=CIV https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1953 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1954 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1717

The most anticipated topic requested so far, Online Defamation. The previous three episodes (Defamation, Sec. 230, Anti-SLAPP) have led up this edition and provide some helpful information. Of course you can enjoy without listening to those episodes, but you wouldn't watch Back to the Future Part 3 without watching the first two, so, proceed as you wish. https://casetext.com/case/vogel-v-felice 

Ladies and Gentlemen this week we return to discuss the Anti-SLAPP statute in California. Necessary information in this statute will key into understanding our next episode featuring Online Defamation. Included are links to articles and cases referenced on this episode. And you can still send your questions into [email protected] https://medialaw.org/component/k2/item/4916-rachel-maddow-wins-dismissal-of-oan-defamation-suit-under-anti-slapp-statute https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/oan-to-pay-msnbc-250-000-in-fees-after-losing-maddow-libel-suit https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/3d/23/899.html (Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Ctr.) https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b439add7b0493476b135 (Kronemyer v. Internet Movie Database (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 941.) https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1544271.html (Wong v. Jing, 189 Cal. App. 4th 1354) https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1857269.html (Shantel Jackson v. Floyd Mayweather Jr.) https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/418/323 (Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.) https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1053102.html (AMPEX CORPORATION v. CARGLE)

Ladies and Gentlemen we return and prep for our discussion regarding Online Defamation, we do so by discussing Section 230 of the Communications Decency act. This is definitely useful information to have before we tackle the topic of Online Defamation happening next week. And don't forget to send your questions to [email protected] Cubby v. Compuserve (https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/776/135/2340509/) Stratton Oakmont v. Prodigy Services (https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/4540) Sec. 230 of Communications Decency Act (https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-47-telecommunications/47-usc-sect-230.html)

Ladies and Gentlemen we return this week with Defamation. This has been a hot topic among requesters, and we dive head first by discussions CACI 1704 and CACI 1720, plus we touch on SLAPP Lawsuits and Anti SLAPP motions. And don't forget you can send in YOUR questions to [email protected].

This week we answer a listener question who was cited for Exhibition of Speed when screeching their tires after a red light. Our favorite Lawyer goes over a very similar case where an appeal gave him and his client the victory. And don't forget to send in YOUR questions to [email protected]!

This week we kick off the New Year by discussing new California Laws to go into effect in 2021. Below are links containing all the info covered on this week's episode. Don't forget to send in your questions to [email protected]! Law Enforcement Uniforms Senate Bill No. 480 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB480) Driver Record, Points Assembly Bill No. 47 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB47) Executive Board Diversity Assembly Bill No. 979 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB979) Unattended children, liability Assembly Bill No. 2717 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB2717) COVID-19 Exposure, Notification Assembly Bill No. 685 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB685) Reparation Task Force Assembly Bill No. 3121 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB3121) Conviction Expungements Assembly Bill No. 2147 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB2147) Youth Criminal Justice Reform Assembly Bill No. 901 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB901) Family Leave for More Workers Senate Bill No. 1383 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB1383) Student Loan Protections Assembly Bill No. 376 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB376) Flavored Tobacco Ban Senate Bill No. 793 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB793) CA Proposition 17 (https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17,_Voting_Rights_Restoration_for_Persons_on_Parole_Amendment_(2020) CA Proposition 19 (https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19,_Property_Tax_Transfers,_Exemptions,_and_Revenue_for_Wildfire_Agencies_and_Counties_Amendment_(2020)