Follow the Money: The Cost of Democracy or the Price of Division?

Every four years, billions of dollars pour into U.S. elections. In 2020, more than $14 billion was spent on campaigns—an astronomical figure for any democracy. We’re often told that these funds are essential to the democratic process, that they help candidates communicate their ideas and reach the people. But in reality, what are we getting for our money? And at what cost?

As we trace the flow of political dollars, one thing becomes clear: the real beneficiaries aren’t the voters. Instead, the system perpetuates deeper division, entrenching a political class that serves those who can pay for influence, rather than “We the People.”

Following the Money: Who Really Profits?

When you dig into the campaign spending breakdown, it’s clear that much of the money is spent on divisive ads, consultants, and media buys. These tools are used not to inform voters, but to manipulate them—stoking fear, anger, and resentment. Negative ads dominate the airwaves and online spaces, creating an environment where tribalism thrives and civil discourse withers.

In the 2020 election cycle, out of the total $14 billion spent, around $2.6 billion came from outside spending, including Super PACs. These entities can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money, often funded by wealthy individuals, corporations, and labor unions, which accounted for nearly 18% of the total spending. Meanwhile, small-dollar donations from individual voters also contributed, but the influence of private money and large donors remains dominant in U.S. elections. This influx of private funds steers the political process toward the interests of the wealthiest contributors, complicating efforts for campaign finance reform.

Political campaigns have become multi-billion dollar enterprises, not designed to unite a country but to amplify the voices of those who already hold power. As more money floods into politics, the influence of average voters diminishes. Those who can write the biggest checks gain the most access to candidates, shaping policies to favor the wealthy and powerful while leaving ordinary citizens behind.

Wisdom Nugget: "The first and best victory is to conquer self." — PlatoContext: Plato believed that personal integrity and self-governance are at the heart of building a just society. In a world where money so often drives politics, citizens can start by reclaiming their own power and striving to act with wisdom and integrity, resisting the temptations of fear and division.

The Role of Dark Money

A significant part of this system operates in the shadows—through dark money. These are funds funneled into politics through nonprofit organizations that are not required to disclose their donors. This secrecy allows billions to flow into campaigns without voters knowing who is influencing their politicians. Dark money organizations often act as intermediaries for corporations and wealthy individuals who wish to shape policy from behind closed doors. The lack of transparency adds another layer of corruption to an already bloated system, making it difficult for voters to understand where candidates' loyalties lie.

Wisdom Nugget: "The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion." — Thomas PaineContext: Paine’s words remind us that the impact of wealth and influence on politics doesn’t have to erode our broader sense of humanity. We can choose to align ourselves with principles that transcend self-interest and wealth, embracing a collective responsibility for the common good.

What Do We Get in Return? Division, Distrust, and Voter Disengagement

After all the money is spent, what do we, as a society, receive? Rather than policy solutions that address the needs of everyday people, we get an increasingly polarized nation. The constant barrage of divisive messaging reinforces an "us versus them" mentality, making compromise and collaboration seem impossible.

Campaign spending often alienates voters, as studies have shown that the relentless negativity of ads can lead to cynicism. This is particularly true among younger and disenfranchised voters, who are left feeling that their votes don't matter in a system driven by wealth and corporate interests. As voter apathy grows, turnout decreases, especially in marginalized communities, and the political process becomes less representative of the population. Instead of inspiring participation, excessive campaign spending drives disengagement, weakening the core of democracy itself.

The result is not just political gridlock but a populace that is more distrustful of government, each other, and the democratic process itself. Voter apathy grows as people feel that their voices are drowned out by corporate interests and wealthy donors. In many ways, this excessive spending deepens the cracks in the foundation of our democracy, eroding trust in the system itself.

Wisdom Nugget: "When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves." — Viktor FranklContext: In the face of a political system that seems overwhelming and divisive, Frankl’s message is that true power lies in how we choose to respond. While we might feel disconnected from policy decisions, we can change our mindset and focus on building communities based on unity, compassion, and understanding.

Campaign Spending’s Impact on Policy-Making

The influence of money in politics doesn’t end on election day. After the ballots are counted, the politicians elected with the help of massive contributions often feel beholden to their biggest donors. This leads to a post-election world where policy decisions are driven by the interests of those with the deepest pockets, rather than the needs of the general public.

For instance, wealthy donors and corporations often lobby for tax breaks, deregulation, or policies that benefit their industries, regardless of the broader social impact. This can result in skewed policies that prioritize corporate profits over public health, environmental sustainability, or economic equity. The cycle of money-driven politics feeds back into itself, reinforcing inequality and widening the gap between the powerful and the average citizen.

A landmark 2014 study by Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page confirms this. Their research analyzed nearly 1,800 policy decisions over two decades and found that economic elites and business interest groups had a substantial impact on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups had almost no independent influence. In short, when the preferences of the wealthy conflict with those of the general public, it is the elites' interests that prevail. The study paints a troubling picture of American democracy, suggesting that it functions more like an oligarchy, where wealth dictates policy outcomes rather than majority rule. This reinforces the idea that the current system overwhelmingly serves the affluent, further sidelining the voices of everyday Americans.

And that study is ten years old. Do you think our situation has gotten better or worse in the last decade? Comment below.

A Look at Alternatives: What If We Tried Something Different?

If we were to step back and rethink how we support our political system, what would that look like? There are already ideas being floated that could help us create a political process that actually serves the people—without the toxic influence of money.

Public Campaign Funding

One of the most promising ideas is publicly funded elections. In this system, candidates receive funding from the public, allowing them to focus on their policies rather than fundraising. It also levels the playing field, giving newcomers and those without connections to wealthy donors a fair shot. Several U.S. cities and states, like Maine and Seattle, have already experimented with this approach, and it’s proven to be effective at reducing the influence of big money.

Wisdom Nugget: "The wise man does not lay up his own treasures. The more he gives to others, the more he has for his own." — Lao TzuContext: Lao Tzu’s wisdom speaks to the value of collective responsibility. In the context of publicly funded campaigns, it echoes the idea that when we all contribute to a fair and open political system, we all benefit, creating a more balanced and just society.

Ranked-Choice Voting

Ranked-choice voting (RCV) offers another alternative to the divisive winner-take-all system. In RCV, voters rank candidates in order of preference. This reduces the incentive for negative campaigning, as candidates need to appeal to a broader base to be successful. It encourages more constructive political discourse and less mudslinging.

Crowdocracy: A Radical Idea

What if we took things a step further? In a system like Crowdocracy, the decision-making power would shift away from a small political elite and into the hands of the people. In this model, decisions are made through a collaborative process that involves the entire population, leveraging the collective wisdom of society.

Crowdocracy rejects the notion that politicians, influenced by lobbyists and donors, know best. Instead, it seeks to harness the knowledge, experience, and creativity of everyone. It’s a bold vision, but one that could offer a path toward a more inclusive, representative, and transparent political process. I'll explore this concept more deeply in a future article, but for now, it’s worth considering how innovative ideas like Crowdocracy could help us break free from the cycle of money-driven politics.

A Call for Change

It’s time to ask ourselves: is this the best we can do? Can we continue to justify spending billions of dollars on political campaigns that often lead to division and disillusionment? Our hard-earned dollars could be used in ways that directly serve the people—improving education, healthcare, infrastructure, or addressing climate change. Instead, they fuel a system that often works against the interests of ordinary citizens.

Wisdom Nugget: "Great things are not done by impulse, but by a series of small things brought together." — Vincent Van GoghContext: Though systemic change can seem daunting, Van Gogh’s wisdom reminds us that progress is made through consistent small actions. Each voice, each vote, each act of advocacy matters in the movement toward a more equitable political system.

The path forward requires radical thinking, bold ideas, and a willingness to embrace alternatives that prioritize people over profits. As we follow the money, we must also follow the consequences it leaves in its wake—and work together to build a political system that truly serves us all.

Unleashed - W. Bradford Swift is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit wbradfordswift.substack.com/subscribe