It’s hard to think every detail the host gives as to why Scott isn’t guilty doesn’t prove he is innocent. She ignores the large details that prove he did do it. I’ve only listened to the Peterson episodes. We’ll see if I get to the others. This is one case I think the detectives got right. Also, host says Scott didn’t have a mistress because he only hooked up with Amber four times, but that is the definition of a mistress. And let’s stop labeling the woman in the negative in these situations. Let’s start just calling him a cheater and a liar and putting the blame where it need to be, not on the female because it suits your poorly done podcast.

Tried to give this show a listen, however the reporting is very biased. Not worth listening to if you can’t get the whole view of each case, which is what a jury is supposed to hear… all sides of a case. Very ironic that it’s called we the jury if the host is only willing to provide one small side of the story.

I don’t understand the bad reviews. It’s always important we listen to both sides. I do not think any of this is biased either though. The media spread a lot of lies about this case and it’s hard to believe that things you’ve thought to be true for years are actually just not true is hard. But in this case, we might have been wrong. And it’s time to find the truth. No one said that Scott is a good guy, I bet he would even say he is not. But there’s a chance he didn’t do it. I also didn’t think she was monotone at all, and I think the sound is totally fine. 5/5

Dull stale takes with weak audio, not worth the listen

Fact: circumstantial evidence is allowed at trial. Fact: Scott Peterson gave detectives a MOUNTAIN of circumstantial evidence. My opinion: when you put those pieces together, like a big ol’ jigsaw puzzle, the picture of the murderer is the husband, Scott. The prosecutors and the jury agreed. But the host of THIS podcast did not. Whatever. Technically speaking, the podcast is a nightmare. The host speaks in a super irritating monotone voice, like she’s reading a very boring microwave repair manual 🤣 The theme music is spooky as though she’s going to whisper a boring Halloween story around a campfire. Take a pass on this podcast!

I’m sure wrong convictions happen too often but I don’t think a rational person would agree with you on his innocence in the death of his wife and son. All things pointed to Scott and it was of his own doing. He’s a habitual liar, cheater, and all-around narcissistic. I pray he never gets out of jail. This episode mostly made me think that he is paying for a podcast like this or for the coverage. Absolutely disgusting.

Aside from the content, which may be biased or may be for entertainment purposes (who cares? Everyone has their opinions on these cases and she’s sharing hers), it’s very hard to listen to these episodes. Host whispers into the microphone and at full volume in my vehicle, it can still be hard to hear. It’s also very tough to stay invested in a series when the episodes are only posted monthly, especially when it’s a multi-part series on a single case. Three months to get 90 minutes on Scott Peterson is way too long to drag it out. I appreciate shedding light on questionable convictions, I just wish the listening experience was better for these ones.

Don’t waste your time.

I listened to both the Scott Peterson case and the Adnan Syed case. The host is clearly biased with inaccurate information. I’m not as well-versed on the Scott Peterson case as I am on the Adnan Syed case, but some of the info she gives is FACTUALLY INCORRECT. It is clear this per/group has done NO WORK on either of these cases and basically just tip off other people’s work and try to jump on the “true crime” podcast money train. If that wasn’t bad, this host has a couple of favorite phrases: “and then”, “then again”, and “and finally”. It’s like listening to a grammar school kid give a books report on a book she hasn’t read except for the jacket cover. There are much better, more knowledgeable, and definitely more accurate podcasts out there that examine true crime and wrongfully convicted. This, though, is definitely not in that category. Skip this.

I listen to and watch a ton of true crime and have followed all the cases you have covered since they happened. I think you do an unbelievable job of research and stating the facts. If people don’t like that you have your own opinion then I guess they don’t know what a podcast is!! I wish you would make more and I would absolutely love your research and thoughts about the Jeffrey MacDonald case!!!

The podcast is billed as I’ll tell you the facts and you make up you mind and it is anything but. It is heavily bias and facts that counter the view are omitted.

Haven’t gotten past the first show but I can tell this woman has her own biased opinions and it is completely ridiculous to believe this person is innocent when he did every thing in his power to prove himself guilty instead of trying to help with the case. No matter the infidelity… although even then he was telling his mistress that his wife “died” before she actually did. Ummm.. it doesn’t take a super intelligent person to figure this whole thing out. He decides to go “fishing” the same morning in the same place her body was found???? How profoundly stupid can you be ??? Wow.

I stumbled upon this podcast on a road trip and being someone who has studied the Darlie Routier case extensively for years, even driven by where house and where the sock was disposed of, and used to believe in her innocence, I was naturally inclined to listen. That being said, I am not a DR supporter anymore and haven’t been for quite some time, bc I finally deduced the irrelevant “evidence” and looked at blood evidence, read trial transcripts, and looked at the FACTS of the case, rather than being blinded by the lie that a mother can’t do that to her babies. SHE CAN AND SHE DID. DARLIE ROUTIER IS 100% GUILTY OF MURDERING HER CHILDREN. I am appalled by the plethora of crucial evidence you didn’t look at, obviously, and didn’t include in the podcast so people could actually make an INFORMED decision. Have me on a rebuttal show and I’ll help you to see the truth.

I am so annoyed with this podcast. There are so many details you left out of the Scott Peterson case. And the way you blamed Amber Frey was very despicable. You’re just as bad as the media. You left out many details. Can ANYONE just present TRUE facts without ANY bias??? Rather innocent or guilty. I want to hear the facts not anyone’s opinion.

Love this podcast, always learn something new about previously well covered cases.

I have been following this unbelievable story since Serial’s release and appreciate the laid out timeline here as well as a few facts I hadn’t heard about yet. Everyone deserves a fair trial, guilty or not. The more people who become aware of the many problems in the US justice & police system, the better. I mean, innocent people have been subjected to the death penalty. That enough should be enough to make a change. Spread the word!

I loved this! The break in between is brutal though! Would love to hear more on other cases!!

One can tell how much research goes into each episode. It’s great quality and I can’t wait for more.

I would invest in this podcast to help fund more consistent downloads! I’m sure the research is time consuming! Thanks for the thought provoking takes on cases we thought we knew!

Bad quality and stupid one sided views

I like the details that are put in in the episodes but the break inbetween (one month) is too long, by the time the second part airs you forget what happened in the first part

Well presented and very bingeable, now I just need more episodes.

Love the podcast keep up the good work