177 The Creek Kings Case – With Mark WilliamsWhat happens when modern poaching meets social media fame? Ohio Wildlife Officer Mark Williamsshares the story of the Creek Kings case, an investigation that exposed years of illegal deer huntinghidden behind a successful YouTube channel. What began with a park visitor finding hunting equipmentin a metro park quickly grew into a massive digital investigation involving trail cameras, cell phone data,deleted evidence, fake hunting locations, sponsorship money, and some very ambitious trophy hunters.Mark takes us through the case from the first clue to the final sentencing and explains how technologyhelped both the offenders and the officers who caught them.Our Sponsors:Thin Green Line PodcastDon Noyes ChevroletNorth American Game Warden MuseumHunt RegsWiseEyeSecureIt Gun StorageXS Sights“A Cowboy in the Woods” BookIron Skillet SeasoningsMaine Operation Game ThiefNew Hampshire Operation Game ThiefConservation Officers of PennsylvaniaNorth East Conservation Law Enforcement Chiefs AssociationInternational Wildlife CrimestoppersNorth American Wildlife Enforcement Officers AssociationHere’s what we discuss: Meet Ohio Wildlife Officer Mark Williams Why Mark calls this a "21st century poaching case" The rise of wildlife commercialization through social media The Creek Kings Outdoors YouTube channel Hunting for views, sponsorships, and online fame A park visitor discovers hunting equipment in Three Creeks Metro Park Metro Park Ranger Stefan Brook gets involved Building partnerships before a major case pays off Trail cameras, tree stands, and ATV trails in the park Investigators identify two cousins as suspects Zach Bethel and Justin Booth become the focus How cellular trail cameras changed the investigation "It would have been impossible for them to do what they did without technology, andimpossible for us to stop them without ours." Rangers document repeated hunting activity Officers begin monitoring the YouTube channel Hunting equipment, filming gear, and surveillance cameras The challenge of predicting suspect movements Rangers catch the suspects entering the park Excuses about lost dogs and accidental hunting Contradictions begin piling up Hidden cameras and deleted messages Evidence tampering enters the picture "The only lesson they learned was not to hunt it with equipment they couldn't carry out." Search warrants for phones and digital devices Suspects underestimate the investigation Recovering deleted information Discovering years of illegal activity Investigators realize the case is much bigger than expected Illegal deer linked to YouTube content Prodigy, Turkeyfoot, Wide 10, and other named bucks Hunting places they had no permission to hunt Recovering deer across multiple properties The fake Kentucky hunts Deer allegedly harvested in Kentucky were actually killed in Ohio Manipulating videos to create a false story Property owners misled by the suspects Sponsors unknowingly backing illegal hunting content "These guys made tens of thousands in material and monetary wealth from illegally killingwildlife." Investigators spend months analyzing phones, computers, drones, and photos Five years of documented activity uncovered The Metro Park becomes their "cheat code" Conversations about avoiding detection Planning future fake Kentucky hunts Using drones to locate deer Hunting-related drone violations Evidence from podcasts, texts, videos, and photos How social media became a treasure trove of evidence The decision to focus on the strongest charges Cooperation between wildlife officers, park rangers, prosecutors, and tech specialists 76 total charges filed Plea agreements and guilty pleas Over $29,000 in wildlife restitution More than $37,000 in total financial penalties Nine days of jail time Five-year revocation of hunting, fishing, and trapping privileges Wildlife Violator Compact consequences across North America Ban from Metro Parks and Alum Creek State Park Restrictions on possessing hunting equipment "They treated it like their own private preserve." The damage done to sponsors and supporters Hunters who felt betrayed by the channel The dangers of chasing fame and online success Lessons for conservation officers facing digital-era wildlife crimes Why Mark believes more cases like this are coming The importance of protecting public resources Final thoughts on greed, accountability, and conservationCreditsHosts: Wayne Saunders and John NoresProducer: Jay AmmannWarden’s Watch logo & Design: Ashley HannettResearch / Content Coordinator: Stacey DesRochesSubscribe:Apple PodcastsSpotifyAmazonGoogleWaypointStitcherTuneInMegaphoneFind More Here:WebsiteWarden’s Watch / TGL StoreFacebookFacebook Fan PageInstagramThreadsYouTubeRSSLearn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices