Show notes
The SEC and CFTC’s recent actions against Uniswap and Galois Capital could mark a turning point in crypto regulation. With both firms settling on relatively low fines, are we witnessing regulators establish precedent for a broader crackdown on the industry? In this episode, Larry Florio, general counsel at 1kx, delves into the implications of these settlements, the frustrations asset managers face with regulatory compliance, and whether the SEC’s approach could push the crypto industry into a corner. Will these actions set a precedent for more aggressive enforcement ahead?Show highlights:Why the SEC's action against Galois Capital highlights a shift in language, focusing on tokens "offered and sold as securities"What a qualified custodian is and why the SEC's action against Galois punishes them for using FTX, which could have fit one definition of a qualified custodian if it hadn’t been perpetrating a fraudHow the SEC demands crypto fund managers comply with regulations on qualified custodians while also limiting qualified custodians in cryptoWhether the SEC is effectively banning crypto funds by requiring compliance with impossible rulesHow the SEC penalized Galois for giving affiliates better liquidity terms than outside investorsHow SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda’s call for clarity on "crypto asset securities" reflects the industry’s frustration with the lack of clear guidelines from the SECWhy the CFTC's fine against Uniswap for alleged leveraged transactions may set a precedent for future enforcement actionsHow Commissioner Summer K. Mersinger's dissent highlights the unfairness of punishing Uniswap despite their proactive compliance, according to LarryWhether the New York Attorney General’s subpoenas to VCs about Uniswap signal a renewed adversarial approach to regulating DeFiThe timing of these actions, along with the SEC’s Wells notice to OpenSeaVisit our website for breaking news, analysis, op-eds, articles to learn about crypto, and much more: unchainedcrypto.comThank you to our sponsors!iTrustCapitalPolkadotMantleGeminiStellarGuestLarry Florio, general counsel at 1kxTimestamps: ➡️ 01:51 - The SEC using different language to describe tokens as securities➡️ 04:53 - Qualified custodians & Galois Capital's use of FTX➡️ 09:04 - Compliance frustrations for crypto asset managers➡️ 11:58 - The SEC effectively banning crypto funds?➡️ 18:22 - Penalty for giving some investors undisclosed preferential treatment➡️ 18:25 - SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda’s call for clarity on crypto assets➡️ 19:35 - CFTC's fine against Uniswap: A troubling precedent?➡️ 23:09 -Uniswap's compliance efforts & two CFTC Commissioners’ dissents➡️ 24:56 - NY Attorney General’s subpoenas➡️ 27:04 - OpenSea’s Wells notice: NFTs as securities?➡️ 30:34 - Crypto News RecapLinksGalois Capital:The Block: SEC charges and settles with crypto-focused Galois Capital over custody issuesLarry Florio’s threadUniswap: CoinDesk: Uniswap Labs Settles CFTC Charges Over 'Illegal' Margin ProductsBlockworks: CFTC Commissioners dissent on Uniswap settlementComments from Uniswap counselAxios: The SEC has questions for VCs about UniswapNY Attorney General’s SubpoenasCoinDesk: VC Giants a16z, Union Square Ventures Get Subpoenaed by New York About Uniswap: SourcesOpenSea’s Wells notice:Unchained: If the SEC Sues OpenSea, Here's Why the NFT Platform Could Win Easily Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
