In today's episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan, The Beard of Empathy, and Sofia Spina explore deconstruction journeys, recycled god arguments, and the psychology behind psychic belief.Kelly in OR, a veteran and retiree, shares how finding the term deconstruction gave her a framework for understanding her exit from fundamentalist religion. The hosts discuss processing anger and resentment that often accompany leaving deeply held beliefs. What tools help navigate the emotional aftermath of religious trauma?Felix in Puerto Rico returns with a dichotomy argument claiming reality's existence proves God. The hosts point out he's reading from the same script as his previous call and challenge his false dichotomy. Why does repeating an argument verbatim not make it more convincing?Frank in CA insists psychics are real because they exist across cultures and supposedly predicted 9/11. The hosts explain cold reading techniques, confirmation bias, and how widespread belief doesn't establish truth. Why do people remember the hits but forget the countless misses?Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, Kelley Laughlin and Rion Cultastic tackle epistemology, biblical morality, and the search for evidence!Adam in NC raises concerns about mythicism and how non-believers can be tricked into false claims. He argues that Jesus likely existed historically despite lacking strong scholarly support for mythicism. How do we separate historical claims from religious ones? What standards of evidence should we apply to ancient figures?Billy in KY challenges the show's claim about worshiping an evil God. The conversation heats up when hosts point to biblical slavery and the flood as examples. Billy defends religious people and shares his Iranian wife's perspective on Middle East conflicts. Can we separate believers from the beliefs they hold?Jake in MD, a deist, asks if there's truly no evidence for or against God. Hosts discuss ignosticism and the lack of a universal God definition. Jake argues for God based on cause and effect, but Kelley introduces indefinite causal order research. Does causality require a first cause?Eugene in WA insists God is all good, not evil. He claims physicists find God through research and that Jesus has more evidence than anything else. Eugene shares a nail gun incident as proof of God's intervention. Do personal experiences count as evidence for everyone?Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan and Volcy explore deconstruction journeys, evidence-based thinking, and whether nature or cultural impact can justify God claims.Jon in Canada argues that nature itself is God through a naturalistic pantheist lens, combining Spinoza's philosophy with emergent consciousness. The hosts challenge why the God label is necessary at all. If you're just describing natural phenomena, why add the baggage of a term loaded with supernatural connotations? What does calling nature "God" add to our understanding that simply studying nature doesn't already provide? When you strip away all the traditional attributes of God, what's left that justifies using the word?Antonio in TX argues that God is real because of religion's massive cultural impact on society. The hosts counter that impactful ideas aren't necessarily true or good. Slavery had cultural impact. Harmful religious influences on policy and rights demonstrate that widespread belief doesn't equal truth. If cultural impact made something real, would that make every influential myth throughout history real? What's the difference between something being culturally significant and something being actually true?Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan and B-Easy explore cosmological arguments, mysterious lights, and the problem of evil!Papo in Puerto Rico presents a cosmological argument claiming dependent beings prove God's existence. The hosts challenge his circular reasoning and ask him to demonstrate why the universe must be dependent rather than necessary. Why does one dependent being logically prove God exists? Can you explain the connection without assuming your conclusion?Georgi in Bulgaria discusses seeing mysterious lights in the sky and believes humans are non-physical eternal beings. He mentions quantum tunneling and claims we're in a physical reality for adventure. What evidence supports these claims beyond personal experience? Why should we accept this explanation over natural phenomena?George in FL, who studied to be a priest, calls to discuss why the hosts don't believe in God. He claims he's no longer Christian because churches won't baptize animals. The conversation becomes contentious as George repeatedly talks about previous callers instead of engaging with the hosts' explanations. Is anger really the reason for disbelief?Marie in TX asks about the Shroud of Turin and discusses miracles, cancer remissions, and exorcisms. The hosts explain spontaneous remission as a natural phenomenon and note that supposed demonic languages in exorcisms have been debunked. Would desperation change what we accept as evidence?Jake in MD identifies as agnostic theist and discusses whether it's more logical to believe everything happened by chance or that there's a guiding force. The hosts discuss the problem of evil and natural processes. Jake acknowledges he was raised Christian and trained to think everything has a reason, admitting fear may play a role.Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!00:00 Intro28:59 Papo-(Puerto Rico) | Dependent Beings Prove God42:55 Georgi-(Bulgaria) | Mysterious Lights And Non-Physical Beings51:43 George-FL | Former Priest Student Questions Disbelief1:08:06 Marie-TX | Shroud Of Turin And Miracles1:19:30 Jake-MD | Agnostic Theist Explores Chance Versus DesignBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today’s episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan is joined by Born Again Atheist to explore deconstruction stories and the pitfalls of extreme indoctrination! They dive into the "worship leader side-hustle," the Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham debate, and why learning psychology is the ultimate faith-killer. Can a community built on facts survive the pressure of religious excommunication?Mohammed in India challenges the hosts to prove their own existence before they can criticize belief in God. ObjectivelyDan and Born Again Atheist point out that responding on camera provides more evidence for their existence than any deity has ever offered. If a standard of proof is set too high to be useful, what is the point of the conversation?Sven-WA accuses the hosts of obfuscating the problem of solipsism to make a previous caller look silly. ObjectivelyDan argues that solipsism is a philosophical dead end that doesn't actually provide evidence for any specific deity. Does questioning the existence of other minds actually make ancient miracles more plausible?Jesse-TX claims the complexity of life and mathematical order in the universe prove a creator exists. Born Again Atheist points out that the biblical creation story contradicts the observable order of the natural world, such as trees appearing before sharks. Will future predictions about Middle Eastern wars provide the evidence the Bible lacks?Josh-WA presents the "minimal facts" case for the resurrection, citing the radical transformation of the disciples as proof. The hosts challenge the reliability of hearsay testimony and compare the disciples' sincerity to modern cult followers. Is a 2,000-year-old story enough to bridge the gap between faith and fact?Thank you for joining us today! We will see you next time!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today’s episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan is joined by Nintendrew for his official debut in the skeptic community! They explore the "Bite model" of cults, the bizarre pseudo-history of British Israelism, and why secular morality outshines religious dogma. Can even the most intelligent people be fooled by a well-crafted narrative?Omar in TX asks about religion and conspiracy theories in gaming culture. Drew shares how debunking a 1980s Nintendo rumor revealed the fragile nature of historicity. If we can't verify recent facts, how can we trust ancient manuscripts? Why do even skeptical communities fall for rage-baiting?Will in the UK argues that trillionaires are ethical because they take massive risks that drive innovation. Dan and Drew challenge this, noting that extreme wealth often stems from anti-competitive monopolies. Does a broken system justify such a wealth gap? Can any amount of charity balance the scales?Thank you for joining us today! We will see you next time!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today’s episode of Truth Wanted, Objectively Dan is joined by Bored Agnostic to explore the complexities of deconstruction, racial religious identity, and the foundations of morality! They dive into the slave morality of the black church, the philosophical pitfalls of personal experience, and why typewriter gods fail the reality test. Can critical thinking bridge the gap between religious tradition and objective truth?Nye in NC asks why cognitive dissonance is prevalent in black Christian communities. Bored Agnostic explains how religious identity often overrides racial identity, creating a slave morality. Will recognizing these roots help break the cycle?Ray in NY presents a typewriter God thought experiment. Dan argues that a being interacting with the sky is still a natural phenomenon, not a prime mover. Ray claims to know God's nature through ecstasy. Can personal feelings prove a deity?Bob in CA, a former atheist, argues for Christianity through objective morality and the cosmological argument. Dan and Bored Agnostic debate moral realism versus evolved biological strategies. Is secular logic a better ground for ethics?Thank you for joining us today! We will see you next time!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today’s episode of Truth Wanted, Kelley Laughlin and guest Steve Ghikadis explore the landscape of secular humanism and the importance of compassionate community! From the trials of humanitarian volunteering and the necessity of public libraries to the intricacies of evolutionary evidence, the hosts dive into how logic and empathy provide a superior foundation for truth. Can secular curiosity survive the pressure of religious education?Kind Bite in Finland is a parent raising a child fearing hell. Kelley and Steve suggest religious literacy and Socratic questioning to encourage critical thinking. Can normalized variety and an open mind prevent a backfire effect? Will the child return to a secular perspective?Thank you for joining us today! We will see you next time!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today’s episode of Truth Wanted, Thinker is joined by Mama Bash and Pynk Beard to explore the nature of objective reality and the mechanics of deconstruction! They dive into the "wallet fairy" of personal testimony, the chemical compounds of love, and whether logic requires a metaphysical anchor. Can we separate our subjective "my truth" from the hard, cold facts of the universe?Trish-(TikTok) asks if truth and facts are synonymous. Pynk Beard explains that while honesty is subjective, truth must comport with objective reality. They use a "wallet fairy" analogy to show how stories can be factually false. How can we prevent feelings from coloring data?Truth Follower-(TikTok) argues for an intelligent creator to ground reality. Pynk Beard defends the laws of logic, noting that a "married bachelor" cannot exist. They explain that consciousness and love are measurable physical processes. Does reality need a supernatural supervisor?Thank you for joining us today! We will see you next time!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today’s episode of Truth Wanted, Jamie the Blind Limey and Doctor Ben explore the intersection of medical ethics and religious traditions! Joined by guest Kelley Laughlin, they dismantle the absurdity of Chick tracts and discuss the secular nature of community. Can critical thinking overcome the dangers of ancient burial rituals and end-of-the-world fantasies?Rebecca in CA asks where aid workers should draw the line between respecting burial customs and preventing Ebola outbreaks. Jamie and Ben discuss prioritizing public health over spiritual rituals. Will logic save communities from faith?Thank you for joining us today! We will see you next time!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.