Show notes
About this episode’s guest:Calli Schroeder is an attorney in privacy/data security, as well as a privacy advocate and self-described “die-hard nerd.” Her brief stint as a wedding singer led her to wonder if she had violated copyright law, an interest which transitioned to tech law broadly and privacy law specifically. While in law school, Schroeder interned for FTC Commissioner Julie Brill, published an article on consent issues and IRBs in the Colorado Technology Law Journal, among other accomplishments distinctions. She developed a focus on consumer protection issues, surveillance, data breaches, and freaking people out at parties.She tweets as @Iwillleavenow.This episode streamed live on Thursday, July 30, 2020. Here’s an archive of the show on YouTube: About the show:The Tech Humanist Show is a multi-media-format program exploring how data and technology shape the human experience. Hosted by Kate O’Neill.Subscribe to The Tech Humanist Show hosted by Kate O’Neill channel on YouTube for updates.Full transcript: 00:23[Music]00:43all right00:56welcome to the tech humanist show00:59a multimedia format program01:02exploring how data and technology shape01:04the human experience01:06i’m your host kate o’neill please01:09subscribe or follow wherever you’re01:10watching or listening to this so that01:11you won’t miss any new episodes because01:13we have a lot of great guests coming up01:15and today’s guest is no exception today01:18we are talking with01:19kelly schroeder an attorney in privacy01:22and data security01:23she’s a privacy advocate and01:25self-described die-hard nerd01:27i think we many of us can relate to that01:30i love this part her brief stint as a01:32wedding singer led her to wonder01:35if she had violated copyright law an01:37interest01:38interest which transitions into tech log01:41broadly and privacy law specifically01:43while in law school straighter interned01:45for ftc commissioner julie brill01:47published an article on consent issues01:49and irbs in the colorado01:51technology law journal among other01:54accomplishments and distinctions01:55she developed a focus on consumer01:57protection issues surveillance01:59data breaches and freaking people out at02:01parties02:03among the certifications she holds are02:04privacy designations for the u.s02:06europe and canada she’s originally from02:08whitefish montana02:10and cali holds an undergraduate degree02:12in peace studies from whitworth02:13university02:15outside of work she enjoys traveling02:17music and extensive debates02:18about comic books i’ve been so looking02:21forward to this so02:22please help me welcome i think maybe02:25that might have fixed it02:26uh someone please oh here we go uh02:29michael rockwell kate o’neil we lost02:30your audio we can hear02:31cali but not you thank you i am having02:34such a02:35a tough time with the audio for this02:37show i don’t know why02:38i definitely need to look into that but02:41let me02:42let me uh just go through and make sure02:45that02:45everybody knows that we’re talking to02:47cali straighter and she’s a an attorney02:49who focuses in data and privacy issues02:52all right michael rockwell confirms i’m02:55back now thank you michael02:58so um back to talking about the03:02copyright law around uh the wedding03:06singing03:06but that you know so so that leads you03:08into into um03:10tech law broadly so it’s like you’re03:12interested in the copyright application03:14but how does that then translate into03:16becoming interested03:17in in tech law and privacy03:20uh it was it was an interesting shift i03:23started taking copyright and ip classes03:25in law school just03:26because i thought that was interesting03:27given my background03:29and part of what got me into tech more03:31broadly and into privacy specifically03:33was03:34i really loved the professor i had for03:36copyright law so i just started taking03:38more and more of his classes03:39um his name is paul ohm he now heads up03:42teklon03:43policy division over at georgetown shout03:45out to paul03:46um all right he’s great um but he03:50because he’s got a programming03:51background he taught some really03:52fascinating classes so he had a jan term03:54class on uh03:55technology law and coding for lawyers uh03:58privacy for lawyers uh04:00he taught a computer crimes class and oh04:03that sounds really04:03fascinating oh it was so cool i loved04:06that class04:07um i read a lot about snowden for a04:10stretch04:11uh and and through that i broadly got04:13more and more interested in privacy more04:15and more interested in surveillance tech04:17uh i joined and later worked for the04:20colorado04:20technology law journal and that led to04:23me04:24getting more and more into these these04:27tech issues04:28so it it kind of came about by accident04:30i’ve never been a particularly techy04:32person04:33i’m a privacy and tech lawyer who will04:36openly admit because i i know it’s a04:38huge mistake to pretend you know more04:40than you do04:40i i don’t know how to code i’m trying to04:43teach myself and i’m very slow because04:45i’m not good about setting aside04:47practice time04:49but i i just find the area so04:52fascinating04:53and and now i’m i’m deep in the weeds of04:56it04:56yeah increasingly so right like so04:58you’re you have certifications05:00uh in privacy as a intern and what does05:04the cipp stand for05:05remind us uh it’s the certified05:08information professional05:10okay and leave and you have that05:13professional05:14information privacy professional uh say05:16that a few times fast i guess05:18so you have that designation applying to05:21is it canada05:22the us and europe are those those three05:25canada u.s europe and now i have the05:27cipm which is05:29the the privacy management and the the05:31fip which is the fellow of information05:33privacy i05:35full disclosure part of why i have so05:36many certifications is because05:38i worked for the iapp after law school05:40and while i was working there i could05:42take the tests for05:43for free when they offered them so05:45that’s great that’s that’s part of why i05:47just took a test05:48every single time they offered the05:50chance to the smart i i remember i05:52used to work at a language school and05:54one of the perks we had was that we got05:55to take free language tests05:57i just kind of i just kept racking up05:59all kinds of language06:00classes that’s amazing certification so06:03uh06:03you know but but as you as you’ve gotten06:06deeper into that and you have all these06:07certifications and you are working in06:08the space06:09it’s become a more interesting space i06:11mean every year it seems like it becomes06:13a more interesting space06:15so you’ve got you know gdpr hitting the06:18scene and what was it 201806:20right yep yeah my my big projects when i06:23was at the iapp06:24the the gdpr had been passed and was06:27going to go into effect shortly and so06:29we were doing a lot of06:30redrafting the the eu documentation and06:34trying to put out guidance and really06:36interpret06:37how that was going to be applied so i06:38was doing all of the prep work at the06:40iapp06:41and then jumped to a firm afterwards06:42where i was doing more of the practical06:44client guidance on how to be compliant06:47before the effective date hit06:48okay okay i was going to ask you to sort06:50of walk us through what that kind of06:52what that type of work looked like but06:53i think so many of us received emails06:56notifying us that it was coming that we06:57probably06:58have a sense of what that looked like07:01what was that07:02like boots on the ground was that what07:03that was there’s a lot of guidance and07:05handholding about like who you’re gonna07:06have to notify and by when and stuff07:08like that or was it07:09uh it was it was a lot a lot of working07:12directly with clients that way and a lot07:14of it was really building out an07:15internal privacy program for clients07:17that07:18for a lot of us based clients it’s not07:20that they were purposely negligent when07:22it came to data protection or data07:23mapping practices07:24they just had never had any real07:29regulatory motivation to pay attention07:31to that and so it always fell by the07:33wayside when it came to allocating07:34resources so07:36we were building a lot of programs from07:38the bottom up we were07:39doing data mapping for the first time in07:41companies you know they were figuring07:42out exactly where all the information07:44that they07:45collected went and what they collected07:47and why they used it07:48and what legal bases we could use to07:51justify that or whether they needed to07:52start deleting stuff07:53and um it was it was interesting you get07:57a really good07:58idea of kind of the inner workings of07:59companies and08:01uh start to develop a lot of strategies08:03for08:04figuring out what questions to ask and08:06when you need to08:08push a little deeper on on things08:11nobody likes to admit that they may not08:13know exactly where everything goes08:15within their company but08:16particularly for large companies or08:18companies that collect a lot of data08:19it’s extremely common08:21so yeah i would imagine and so and then08:24of course we have08:25the california privacy act that comes08:28online that came online what january08:29this year08:31is that right so was it again sort of a08:34repeat of08:35gdpr that was interesting we had a08:37really big split with the ccpa08:40for gdpr i feel like uh it kind of put08:43the fear of god in a lot of u.s08:44companies so08:46everyone was scrambling for compliance08:47we had a huge influx of people asking to08:49help08:50uh help them with compliance before the08:52due date hit08:53with ccpa i saw a real divergence in08:56approach there were there were a lot of08:58companies that were very responsible and09:00um came to us wanting us to help them be09:03compliant with the ccpa09:05right as the enforcement date hit so09:06they were ready to go09:08um and then not necessarily my clients09:11but i09:11i did see in quite a lot of instances09:13there seemed to be09:15uh more companies that were willing to09:17gamble when it came to compliance that09:18way09:20i don’t know if that’s because they they09:23thought the attorney general wouldn’t be09:24able to enforce09:25and mass or whether they thought that09:28you know their their privacy practices09:29were maybe not fully compliant but09:31probably good enough to skate by for a09:33while and kind of wanted to get the lay09:34of the land before figuring out09:36resources but09:37uh it was surprising seeing that split09:39from the gdpr09:40and now with the cpra on the ballot09:42it’ll be even more interesting because09:44if that passes it09:46it will definitely raise the amount of09:48enforcement actions09:50yeah and so do you feel like d did you09:52observe anecdotally09:53that it changed the discourse at all09:56when09:56uh the gdpr um suits started happening10:00and10:00that the enforcement was happening and10:03and google and other companies were10:05actually receiving10:06fines was that changing the way10:08companies were taking it seriously10:10from what i’ve seen yes and and in10:12particular one of the things i noticed10:13is that10:14clients even of smaller mid-level10:16companies that maybe hadn’t paid much10:18attention to privacy or data security10:19before10:20uh were paying attention to these10:22lawsuits they were coming to10:24us saying hey i just read about this10:26should i be worried do i need to change10:27things10:28what should i be looking at i mean for10:30example we just had the shrems 2 case10:31happen10:32i had a bunch of clients reach out to me10:34proactively before we had issued our10:36statement on it10:37saying this seems like it changes things10:40what do we need to do10:41how should we take care of this and10:43frankly it was pretty refreshing to see10:45that so many of our clients were now10:47actively paying attention to this on10:48their own as an issue10:50yeah that makes sense and so i guess you10:53know and one thing i’m really curious10:54about10:55to talk about with you and and i i want10:56to um10:58i want to spill that you uh told me via11:01email as we were prepping for the show11:02you said11:03that you have minors in both philosophy11:05and theology11:06in your undergrad and so you11:08occasionally get a little into privacy11:09affecting the nature of society and11:11humanity11:11and you said but i will try to reel it11:13in and i’m like no don’t reel that in11:15that’s exactly what we want to bring to11:17the show so i guess11:19you know one question i have for you on11:20that in in that more esoteric11:23you know kind of uh philosophical bent11:25is11:26do you think that the way we conceive of11:28privacy11:29has changed or is changing or is due to11:32change11:33uh is like where do you think the11:36uh you know what externalities do you11:38think kind of come into the way that11:40that11:40humans conceive of privacy and what it11:43what is going to11:44happen over the next few years over the11:46next11:47few milestones what do you what do you11:49see those as being11:51yeah not a small question i understand11:53not a small question11:54but an important one um to preface11:56there’s11:57i i’m a little split in my uh12:00professional and personal approaches to12:01privacy so12:02obviously personally i’m i’m very very12:05privacy protective and i’m12:06very loud about that online uh and12:09personally i12:10i believe myself to maintain those12:14those uh values but i i need to channel12:17them in practical ways that clients can12:19actually use like there’s12:20there’s the idealistic form of privacy12:23that i think i have in my personal life12:25and then there’s also the practical form12:27of well okay but this company is not12:29going to just stop collecting data12:31right right and so how can i how can i12:33guide them in a way that makes them do12:35it as responsibly as possibly and as12:36ethically and transparently as possible12:39while meeting regulatory requirements so12:41this i’m gonna go full into my12:43personal answer on privacy perspectives12:46but12:47uh so i do believe that our our um12:51approach toward privacy12:53has been fundamentally changing i12:55believe that for many years it’s been12:56changing12:57in the direction where people haven’t13:00been paying attention to it and have13:02lost a good13:03amount of uh the kind of privacy that we13:06we were used to and part of that comes13:08from the development of technology you13:10know we have13:11um so much more prevalent technology13:13that’s really permeated every area of13:14life you have13:15you know in i there there’s smart13:17fridges on the market right it’s really13:19hard for me to find13:20non-connected kitchen devices when i was13:23redoing yeah we just bought an13:24air conditioner an in-window air13:26conditioner for our apartment and it was13:28so hard to pick one that didn’t have you13:30know smart features built in13:32like i don’t want that i don’t want a13:33smart air conditioner yeah i had to get13:36a new television13:37oh my gosh it was such a nightmare13:38trying to find one that wasn’t a smart13:40tv it wasn’t connected somehow and13:42it’s it’s so hard good luck next time13:44you have to buy a toilet13:45i mean oh i know it’s ridiculous all13:47over the place13:49but yeah because of all of those changes13:50and because it’s so interwoven with just13:53the aspects of our daily life i i feel13:55like there’s been this gradual shift in13:58that where before13:59you you got to be a lot more deliberate14:01about what14:02aspects of who you are and what pieces14:04of information about you you shared with14:06different people in different settings14:09now it’s just ingrained and so the the14:11choice is gone in a lot of ways but14:13i’ll also say that i’ve seen a much more14:15positive trend in privacy in that14:17there’s been a lot more pushback in in14:20at least recent years14:22so some of it’s regulatory the gdpr is a14:24great14:25great prompt for considering privacy14:27concerns14:28um the u.s is very sectoral in its14:30privacy approach but there’s been14:32individual state laws that are14:34incredible like the the illinois14:36biometric information privacy act is14:39is great and having some really cool14:40enforcement ccpa14:42is prompting some really great14:44conversations around14:45what information we protect and how we14:47protect it and what level of control we14:49have14:49and whether that should be left to14:50people on a societal level14:54the interesting thing for me is seeing14:55younger generations and what their14:57approach is to privacy into being14:58watched14:59yeah and you know i’m i’m millennial so15:03i grew up in a little bit of the cusp15:04you know when i was15:05very young we had a computer in my house15:08when i was15:09probably 10 or 11. but they were so old15:13and you didn’t use them all that often15:15for a long stretch you used them for you15:17know word documents15:18but you didn’t necessarily use them for15:20internet all that often15:21and we really didn’t have smartphones in15:23the way that we do now and15:25and living through all those changes and15:27seeing15:28how gradually that happens and how15:30suddenly every aspect of your life15:32is watched uh is really interesting to15:35me15:36particularly seeing this net this15:37current generation that15:39is growing up with all of that just15:40already existing already in place you15:42know15:43um but but one thing that i find so15:46interesting is the ways that they find15:48to push back against that15:49there’s there’s a lot of really creative15:52uh loopholes and workarounds and kind of15:55hacks of tech15:56that younger generations are using so15:59even though they’ve16:00been put into this world where they’re16:01always watched they’re16:03actively fighting for privacy and for16:06space to kind of figure out who they are16:07without eyes on them all the time16:10yeah i just think that’s really valuable16:11it’s such an interesting dichotomy16:13because16:14it is a more connected generation uh in16:16many ways16:17and i think they they are inherently16:20that the the younger you skew i know16:22that there are some differences16:23generationally where16:24uh some actually prefer less online time16:27uh but but i think in general like i’m16:29gen x so the the younger you skew in16:31general away from16:32my generation and above you know you see16:35a lot more16:36native sort of familiarity with being16:38online but yes you’re right and then16:40those attitudes also change like there’s16:41there16:42isn’t an inherent acceptance of16:45the trade-off of that i’m i’m gonna give16:47up so much of my self and you know what16:51quantifies who i am16:52so that you can then sell to me more16:55effectively yep16:58well it’s interesting i i agree with i17:00think i i’m17:01probably very aligned with your your17:03distinction on the personal and17:04professional level17:06on the professional level is a really17:08interesting one though because i think17:10you do have to have this kind of17:11pragmatic it’s not it’s not defeatism i17:14don’t think but it’s a pragmatic view17:16that you know that17:17companies are going to collect data and17:19they are going to use it17:21in aggregate and in segments to be able17:24to you know better understand17:26targeting offers or better understand17:30even just to improve user experiences17:32you know inherent to17:33to the uh to the pages and sites that17:36they serve up17:37so so how do you now how do you take17:39over from the the personal17:41approach and carry it over into the17:42professional like where do you17:44where do you go with that well one thing17:47is that i i’m really grateful that my17:51super privacy protective perspective17:53from my personal life17:54can carry over in a ethical and17:56responsible way where i’m still advising17:58my clients well when i’m telling18:00them to you know practice data18:02minimization18:03and you know make sure that they’re only18:05collecting the information they need and18:07that they’re18:07putting in really good security18:09protocols and that they’re very clear18:10and transparent about what they’re doing18:12and honest with their users18:14um i i like to push really hard for18:17people18:18for the companies to understand what’s18:20going on with their data because a lot18:21of companies18:22use vendors that are just common you18:24know you use google analytics or18:26you you use uh different storage vendors18:30and18:31share information with you know people18:34that are18:35using behavioral advertising algorithms18:37and things like that and so18:38being able to advise them and have18:40discussions with them where i’m saying18:42i really think you should evaluate what18:44this18:45costs you an effort in disclosing all of18:48this and making sure you’re doing it18:49correctly versus what you’re getting18:50from it i’ve had some really interesting18:52discussions with clients about the value18:54of behavioral advertising and18:56that i don’t think there’s much value in18:58it and not to mention19:00protecting it against breaches and leaks19:02so you know the risk19:03yeah the more information you have the19:05more risk you have of a breach and the19:07more liability you have you know if19:09if you have a data breach and all you’ve19:10collected about your clients is19:12uh name and mailing address for the19:14services that’s hugely different than if19:16you’ve also collected their19:18you know race and gender and income and19:21financial account information and uh19:24sexual orientation19:25and people collect so much nowadays just19:28because they can19:29because the technology is capable of19:31that and until you push back a little19:33bit and challenge them and say okay but19:35why that why do you need that why do you19:37want that and19:38really highlight for them that they’re19:40raising their own risk19:42it’s that that’s something that helps me19:45kind of justify to myself the work i do19:47because i i can see19:49and i know that there are some privacy19:52really really purists that would argue19:54that19:54me working with clients that collect19:56data is unethical and19:58while i can understand the motivation20:00behind that argument i20:02i find a lot more value in engaging20:05and making the world more privacy20:07protective by talking to companies that20:09are engaged with it20:10and trying to make them do it in a20:12responsible way than i do in just20:14pulling myself out entirely and not20:15engaging yeah and beyond that20:18like i can advise my clients and i do20:20advise my clients and i want to do20:21do right by them and do right by the20:23people whose information they’re20:24collecting20:25but you also can do other things i mean20:27i i also20:29read a bunch of policy proposals and20:31send in20:32um formal comments on privacy laws that20:35are20:36being proposed or uh different20:38approaches to cases or you know we20:40we discuss this all the time20:44with with the different privacy20:46community you know the the privacy20:48to be very active in debates and20:50discussions about20:51regulations and cases and proposals and20:54and you can still be engaged in all of20:56that and push for kind of regulatory and20:58social change while also doing the21:01practical work of telling a client in21:03this circumstance that you’re doing21:05right now21:06here’s how we make this safer yeah and i21:08think you know21:09in my own consulting my own work i find21:11that that conversation21:13about uh the increasing risk when you’re21:15talking about more and more data21:17is a really useful one to have at the21:19sort of c-suite level21:21but also it seems like even just at a21:23strategy level21:24saying that you know you shouldn’t21:25collect data if you can’t21:27think of an aligned reason why you would21:30want to have it right like an21:31aligned between what benefits you and21:33what benefits the customer or the person21:34outside the company21:36like if it’s only benefiting you and21:38it’s not going to benefit21:39them in any way ever then there’s21:42probably really good reason21:44not to even bother collecting it21:45completely agree21:47and also the whole mentality we’re21:48collected just so you have it just in21:50case that’s21:52such an irresponsible perspective both21:54both21:55from a general privacy perspective and21:57for them why would you want21:59piles more information than you’re even22:00using it just increases your risk22:03right right we have a question from one22:05of our followers here one of the22:07audience members david ryan polgar who i22:09love22:10so should social media platforms offer22:11data portability to move valuable data22:14across different platforms what do you22:15think about that22:18i i think more and more as social media22:20has22:21changed in in what it does in different22:23contexts i22:24i think absolutely um i do think22:28partly let me clarify that partly22:29because people use different social22:32media as22:32as tools both professionally and22:34creatively now as well as to connect22:36with other people and for networking and22:38for22:39other services so you know artists and22:41photographers constantly share their22:43artwork through social media22:44and uh writers um practice their craft22:48through social media and22:49people that are in professional spheres22:51like i constantly22:52i mean i’m not necessarily recommending22:54this because i’m sure they get annoying22:56sometimes but i constantly write long22:57twitter threads kind of22:59analyzing privacy issues or legal issues23:01that i see because i want people to23:02engage with it more23:03so i absolutely see the value in data23:06portability and in making sure that you23:08can23:08preserve those things should you leave a23:10platform for whatever reason23:12um i don’t know how useful it always is23:15i think it’s23:16it’s very useful in that you get a copy23:17of everything that you’ve put23:19there i don’t know how portable it is23:21because i don’t know23:22like if i if i took all of my23:24information from twitter23:25tomorrow i don’t know that i could23:27actually transfer that to another social23:29media23:30i don’t think they’re compatible in a23:32lot of ways so i think they’re23:34they’re absolutely uses to data23:35portability i think there’s absolutely23:37value to it and i think there’s value to23:39forcing the company to go through the23:40exercise of saying23:41we know where all of your information is23:43and we we’ve23:44organized this internally sure and23:48you know just to make sure that23:49internally they’re practicing good23:52data structuring and are able to track23:54all of that but23:56yeah i i don’t know about actually23:58transferring it to other platforms23:59that’s kind of an interesting question24:01right it is an interesting thing i’m24:02going to keep thinking about that24:04i also wondering what you think about24:06the uh24:07own your own data sort of movement you24:10know where24:10do you stand on that concept of you know24:13the notion that eventually24:14at some point we may be able to move to24:16a model where people24:18are in uh control of their own data and24:20they can be paid for it and that sort of24:22thing24:22where you are on that so i understand24:25the appeal of it24:26i i absolutely understand that it’s it24:29can be a kind of24:31easier way to wrap your mind around how24:32data works to think of it as a piece of24:34property that you own24:36um i absolutely get the appeal of it i24:38think that there’s some very thoughtful24:40people that support that view i don’t24:44but the reasons that i don’t are first24:47of all24:47i think that puts way too much24:49responsibility on the individual24:51we don’t even know how much information24:54gets collected and by whom half the time24:55so having to24:57uh track that or parcel out25:00portions of your data for different uses25:03i think just puts too much of25:04both a25:07it puts too much of a time25:09responsibility on people certainly25:10i mean that’s a hugely time consuming25:12process but it also25:14puts a lot of research responsibility on25:16people like i work in privacy so i do a25:18lot of research into25:21the trade-offs of sharing information25:23just for my work25:24which is great but other people have25:26full-time jobs in other areas and are25:28taking care of small children or dealing25:29with family members and25:31have lives to live they don’t25:32necessarily have time to sit down and do25:34all of that25:35the other issue i have is it sets up25:39an inequality when it comes to being25:41paid for your information you know who’s25:43going to have the most incentive to25:44share their information25:45even if they wouldn’t normally if25:48they’re getting paid it’s it’s going to25:49be people with lower incomes25:51and so that sets up a system where the25:53wealthy can kind of25:54afford to keep their information private25:57and25:57the less wealthy have a lot more26:00incentive to26:00say i i don’t love this but i need to26:03pay rent26:04so here pay me for this i’ll i guess26:07um so i don’t like that split either and26:10then the the other26:11concern i have with it is i don’t know26:13how much bargaining power you would have26:15with big companies even if you’re the26:17owner of your information26:19big companies are still big companies26:21and they have a lot of power26:22and depending on what they’re offering26:25you may not actually get that much for26:28your information you may not get a ton26:29of money or value for it26:31because you know if you don’t want to26:32sell it there’s26:34a hundred thousand other people that are26:36willing to and they’ll do it at x26:38price so i i just think there are a lot26:41of complications with that approach that26:43don’t necessarily benefit people in the26:45way it’s intended to benefit people26:46yeah no that’s a wonderful thorough well26:50thought out answer and i think26:51another aspect of the point the last26:53point you were just making26:54is that i i’ve seen the numbers26:56somewhere that suggests that26:58individually your facebook data for27:00example would be worth like 20 cents or27:0140 cents or something like27:03that right compared to you know in the27:05aggregate27:06what facebook is going to get in in27:09terms of27:09monetizing it through the advertising27:11platform yeah27:13and being able to offer the the hyper27:14targeting that it does27:16so yeah so i mean there’s absolutely27:18very little incentive to educate27:20yourself and spend the time27:21and and become a merchant of your own27:24data when it means pennies27:28as opposed to frankly just on a personal27:30level i don’t like working in sales so i27:32don’t want to do it27:33my free time absolutely27:36well that’s it’s interesting and by the27:38way david who asked us the question27:40about the uh27:41portability says great answer and loving27:43the show27:45and also another point here from kyle27:47johnson is also the27:48connections you have on a social network27:50aren’t portable to another27:52so you know and and i can even say you27:54know for me27:56the the sort of model that i use mental27:59model that i use for who i connect with28:01on twitter versus facebook versus28:03linkedin28:04very very different you know kind of28:06constantly28:07i’m sure that’s true for most people and28:08so certainly it would seem very28:11meaningless unless you were moving from28:13a twitter-like28:15platform to another twitter-like28:17platform uh28:18you know that you might be able to28:19maintain some of the integrity of those28:21connections but28:22most likely not so that’s a good point28:25well what about you know how do you how28:27do you think about the emerging concerns28:30around privacy i mean certainly we have28:31a lot more surveillance technology28:33coming28:34into uh into being we have um you know28:36facial recognition is28:37an enormous topic within the space where28:40do you28:41sort of find yourself most concerned28:43about privacy issues in emerging tech28:46i mean you’ve you’ve mentioned facial28:48recognition i am hugely concerned with28:50facial recognition partly because it28:52feels28:53i i really hope it doesn’t prove to be28:55but it feels very much like one of those28:56technologies where28:58you know once it’s out it’s you can’t29:00put it back in29:02the this is this doesn’t exist don’t use29:04this category29:06um i feel i i hope that we’re still29:09early enough29:10in the use of facial recognition that29:12there could be steps to29:14restrict it and to put more responsible29:16use cases around it i29:18frankly just really don’t like it as a29:19technology partly because of29:22you know there’s been tons of much more29:24informed people than than29:26me talking about um the the issues when29:28it comes to identifying29:30uh darker skin tones or uh accuracy with29:33non-binary or trans individuals29:35um which is a huge issue because you29:38know in29:38a lot of places including the us there’s29:41there’s higher likelihood that those29:43communities get targeted under these29:44systems anyway and if those all29:46those same communities that are being29:48targeted also have a really high29:50instance of inaccuracy29:51in identification it just it really29:53facilitates29:54the opportunity for abuse of those29:56systems um29:58so i hate that and even beyond that even30:00if facial recognition worked30:02perfectly and identified people30:03correctly every time i still wouldn’t30:05think we should use it because30:07it really does change something about30:09the nature of being tracked everywhere30:10you go it changes something about30:13your freedom to move around a public30:14space and30:16um to restrict your your information and30:19your whereabouts and30:21that sort of thing and and the the30:23counterpoint i hear that all the time is30:25well why would that bother you if you’re30:26not doing anything bad but the30:28i don’t have anything to hide argument30:29has never held water i mean30:31this is gross in case there are people30:34watching or listening30:35who don’t know why that argument doesn’t30:36hold water would you take a moment to30:38say why you think that i mean i30:40certainly feel like it doesn’t hold30:42water but i’d love to hear you30:43uh give if you have a concise30:45explanation as to why30:47the notion if you have nothing to hide30:49that there’s no reason30:50for privacy why is that wrong30:53oh it’s wrong for so many reasons but so30:55the best example i’ve heard is a little30:57gross and i’m so sorry but uh30:59basically there’s a big difference31:01between privacy and secrecy secrecy is31:04is more about concealing something you31:06just don’t want anyone to know about31:08because31:08because it’s you know nefarious or uh31:11perceived badly or whatever31:13privacy just means that you want to31:15conceal it because31:16you don’t feel like sharing it so for31:19example if someone’s31:20if i’m hanging out at my friend’s house31:22and i leave i get up to go to the31:24bathroom there i close the door31:26and i close the like people know what31:28i’m doing in there31:29it’s not secret what’s probably going on31:32in the bathroom but i close the door31:34because i want privacy that’s31:36gross but but beyond that there’s31:39privacy issues when it comes to you know31:40sometimes you may be31:42just wanting to feel out something um31:44and not like like31:46kids trying to figure out what their31:47political views are sometimes you want31:49to be able to explore that or their31:50sexual orientation you want to be able31:52to explore that31:53in a safe and secure way without having31:55to come out with a hard stance or making31:56a decision31:57or or having people observing you32:00because there’s also been32:01multiple studies that just the act of32:03being observed and knowing you’re being32:04observed changes behavior and changes32:06thinking and doesn’t allow people to32:07freely32:09express themselves or explore ideas and32:11and it’s a really stifling32:13situation so a good portion of why i32:17oppose that is the the stifling aspect32:20of it32:20but yeah when it comes down to the i’ve32:22got nothing to hide argument32:24that also changes hugely based on32:26context i mean32:27communities like refugees are surveilled32:30hugely after 9 11 muslim communities32:32were surveilled32:33on an incredible scale and communities32:36of color32:37and people with different sexual32:39orientations or gender presentations are32:41often surveilled much more32:43and they may well want more privacy and32:46it’s not because they’re doing anything32:47wrong it’s because32:49there are elements of the society around32:51them that will punish them for the not32:52wrong things that they’re doing and that32:54they’re observed doing32:55and so the the social context around32:58that is also hugely important33:00just because you don’t think what you’re33:01doing is wrong doesn’t mean that the33:03society around you won’t react badly to33:05it and you should be able to33:07exercise your rights that way without33:09constant surveillance so33:12i think that’s a wonderful answer yeah i33:14mean33:15it seems like you you know you almost33:17could just say well it shows a33:19tremendous amount of privilege to be33:20able to make the statement yeah33:22you have nothing to hide but you gave33:23really crisp and clear examples33:25of that so i think that’s very helpful33:28so but when especially when you were33:29talking about facial recognition and33:31other biometric technology i think33:33what what uh the big concern there is33:35you know those are things you just can’t33:36change33:37so it’s another it’s one thing to be33:39able to change your email get a new33:41face right like like if that gets33:43compromised somehow it’s going to cost33:45me a lot of surgery to get a new face33:46and i like this one33:47so i don’t want to and like i can’t33:50change my dna i can’t change my33:51fingerprints these are33:53these are so immutable if it comes to33:56like an account being breached i can33:57change my password and i can change my33:59my username if i need to but these34:02things are so much more immutable and34:04they’re so much more set and they’re so34:05much more34:06tied to our actual identities and who we34:08consider ourselves to be34:09that i think the level of sensitivity34:12around them is just so much higher and34:13so the level of care should be equally34:15as high and one of the big problems with34:17facial recognition is that the34:18technology34:19has developed so quickly that there34:21really aren’t any regulations in place34:24around34:24it so they’ve been able to come up in34:26this vacuum of34:28of accountability essentially34:32and i’m not saying that there’s never34:34ever a circumstance where facial34:35recognition could be useful or could be34:37used for good purposes34:39i i don’t know enough to say that yeah34:41definitively34:42but for sure we’re not in an environment34:44where there’s checks on that yet and34:46that’s what34:47really scares me there’s always at least34:49one example that that someone’s willing34:51to come up with you know and and i34:52yeah when i had the um super viral tweet34:55around the34:5610-year challenge last year and was34:57making the rounds of the news programs i34:59was using the example of the35:00um the case study of facial recognition35:03having been used in35:05uh in india to track down missing kids35:07but of course we know like there were35:09there was a very limited uh experiment35:12uh we don’t really know how successful35:14it truly was35:16you know how successful it was with35:17facial recognition and would not have35:19been otherwise35:20like there’s no kind of control variable35:22and and the harms greatly exceed35:25the benefits in this and i don’t think i35:27i don’t think that’s35:28even a controversial statement so yeah35:32i it is interesting to see that you know35:34some cities have had some luck with35:36banning facial recognition uh and as you35:38mentioned the illinois35:39uh biometric uh regulation so do you35:43foresee a lot more sort of city by city35:45state by state kind of things coming35:47into play that way within the us35:50i do i know that there’s there’s a big35:52debate raging about whether there’s35:53going to be a federal privacy law in the35:55next year or two years or whatever35:57um i don’t know what’s going to happen36:01there frankly i36:02don’t know that the federal government’s36:03going to get itself together enough to36:05pass anything substantial but36:07regardless we had a few things on our36:09hands right now right36:10yeah there’s some other stuff going on36:12um regardless we’ve had a sectoral36:14system for a long time when it comes to36:16privacy and so36:17i i’ve been really encouraged by the36:19actions i’ve seen statewide36:21and the attention i’ve seen statewide to36:22these issues i would love for more36:24states to adopt something like36:26like bipa and uh start enforcing against36:29biometric36:31privacy violations um i i like what’s36:34happening with ccpa in general because36:36it moves the conversation forward and it36:38moves uh36:40thought about what rights people have to36:42their information and36:43what companies are required to do if36:45they want to use that information36:46um i think that there will probably be36:50more sectoral and statewide regulations36:53when it comes to facial recognition you36:54know seattle’s got that in place i know36:56colorado’s36:57been looking into that um but i i wish37:00it would move a little quicker37:03what makes you optimistic about what you37:06see happening around data privacy law is37:07there anything37:08that that you kind of look at and think37:10that’s what needs to happen and i’m glad37:12to see it happen37:13and maybe you want to encourage it to go37:15faster but where are you most optimistic37:17around it37:19you know one thing that’s made me really37:21optimistic is just the level of37:22engagement by people that don’t work in37:25this space37:26um i think that’s surprising to a lot of37:28people because this seems37:30i feel like privacy can seem like an37:32intimidating space because37:34it can seem very techy and it can seem37:36very37:37you know i don’t know how to code or i37:39don’t know how to program so i probably37:41won’t understand this or37:42you know it can be very easy to fall37:46into kind of a37:48nihilist approach to privacy and say37:49well i can’t control everything so why37:51bother but i’ve seen a lot of engagement37:54with people37:54when it comes to privacy rights and when37:56it comes to hey what should i be asking37:58for and what should i be fighting for37:59and what should i be looking for38:01and that has been really encouraging38:03just on kind of a38:05ground level people seem to care more38:07about this38:08when it comes to regulatory actions you38:10know i i do love that there’s been38:12multiple proposals for38:14a federal privacy law in the u.s i don’t38:16necessarily love all the drafts but i38:18love that there’s that38:19discussion happening and there’s some38:21some action there there’s a little38:22momentum38:23um i think the gdpr was a great step and38:26i i38:27am happy that it’s had the kind of38:28impact it’s had even if it was38:30inconvenient for people38:32at the jump because it does prompt just38:35much more care and much more thought in38:37what people are doing with38:38personal information um all of those38:42i’ve found really encouraging and38:46think the privacy space can feel kind of38:48like38:49a very david and goliath struggle where38:51it’s big companies and big government38:53surveillance structures that are38:55constantly pushing against privacy and38:57you know we’re just these38:59attorneys or individual programmers or39:01individual people that39:03are are bothered by the structure or the39:05system but39:07the fact that we’ve seen these39:08regulations passed and the fact that39:09there’s been39:11outcry against things like mass facial39:13recognition use or39:15or mass surveillance or companies39:19taking as much data as they’re taking i39:21i think that’s a good sign39:23and that’s really encouraging for me39:24personally39:26that’s great and i think you know it39:28seems like i can relate to the idea that39:30people39:31uh seem to struggle with finding privacy39:34a topic that they can get into because39:36it seems at once abstract and arcane39:39and like you have to know a lot of39:41really specific things39:42but you have to care about these very39:45philosophical39:46ideas at the same time and it’s a it’s a39:48tough thing it’s a tough thing to39:50reconcile so it’s39:51i think it’s a wonderful thing that39:52folks like you are39:54focused on that and speaking of folks39:56like you39:57my uh one of my besties tara aaron40:00stelluto40:01has commented and said not sure if this40:03is the right place to ask a question but40:05i’d love to hear40:06what cali has to say about the big eu40:08court of justice opinion last week40:10and what she’s advising clients about40:12how to go forward40:13so it seems like that sort of fits in40:15with both the conversations we were40:17having about you know40:18the professional approach in terms of40:19guiding companies and what you recommend40:21they do but also thinking about40:23regulations and such so40:24what do you have to say uh to tara’s40:26question40:28oh so much has gone on since since40:31the return of shrems i referred to it as40:33the restraining in a professional talk40:35and i feel like that40:36probably shouldn’t stick but uh40:40uh beyond just a lot of urgent client40:42response to different things40:44uh we’ve we’ve had some practical40:46guidance that we’ve issued40:48i personally have been rereading fisa40:50and uh40:51the the eo one two triple three and40:54different40:55surveillance acts and all of that uh40:58practically speaking you know i41:01we’ve been redoing privacy policies that41:03list privacy shield is the sole data41:05transfer method41:06and um we’ve been putting41:09sccs in place we’re making sure that41:11they are in place and they’re41:12enforceable41:13uh and then we’ve been doing some41:14additional work i i advise clients to41:18put some documentation in place where41:20they can really track you know this is41:21the analysis we’ve done41:22of the risks to the data subjects we41:25collect information on and this is what41:27we41:28what we think when it comes to our41:30whether we’re included under fisa scope41:32and what the likelihood is that41:34our information is tracked and these are41:36the agreements we put in place with41:37vendors and41:38uh you know we make sure we encrypt41:40information in these ways i41:42i think having a paper trail is41:43extremely important right now just to41:45show41:46due diligence and that you’ve been41:47paying attention to the issues41:49um i i wish41:52i’m too lawyerly to say this is for sure41:54what you should what you need to do and41:56then you’re fine41:57uh there’s always and it depends in41:59there but42:01i do think that showing clear effort is42:04going to be appreciated and making sure42:06you’re still adhering to the principles42:07that were enshrined under privacy shield42:10is going to be very important42:11um i really hope they put out another42:15framework soon or they put out some42:17guidance soon because42:19right now i feel like all of us are42:21doing our best to42:22responsibly guide our clients through42:24things but it’s42:26it’s still a very influx unsettled area42:29so uh being as responsible as possible42:32making sure we’re doing as much as we42:34can is kind of i hear a dog42:36she really wants to go outside i think42:38there’s a squirrel42:41oh well42:47and i know we had um i’m going to42:50go ahead and cue something up here42:53because we had before the show started42:57we actually had a question that was42:59submitted43:00uh from someone on twitter and i’ll see43:03if i can get this43:03added up on here real quick oh you can43:05barely see it let me make this bigger43:09like that i and43:12uh let’s see if you can see it43:16got a high puppy from uh bruce celery43:19so the dog is already a hit i don’t know43:21about us43:22but the dog is a hit i’ll tell lucy43:25she’ll be very proud43:27layla’s out there fighting with her now43:29it’ll be great43:31that’s great um so shea swagger43:35asked i’d love to hear more about what43:38meaningful consent looks like with data43:39privacy i wonder if there’s anything43:41we can borrow from sex ed about consent43:44being affirmative43:45revocable or centering care or agency43:49what do you have to say about you know43:50where we see if there are parallels that43:53we can pull from43:54you know the conversation about consent43:56in terms of our sexual relationships43:58over into uh data privacy44:02i actually think that’s a really44:03interesting way to frame it um i think44:05there’s absolutely some really valuable44:06things we can take44:07from what we consider to be uh correct44:11sexual consent to you know consent44:14around data i think44:16uh the revocable part is important i44:18think it’s important that it be clear44:20transparency is always clear make sure44:22that everyone engaged in the44:24conversation knows exactly what they’re44:25discussing44:26um and the other part that i think is is44:29actually44:30very important is is consent to various44:33steps of the process44:35so uh if i’m consenting to let a44:38business use my information so i can get44:40their services that doesn’t mean i’m44:42okay with them sharing it with a bunch44:43of other people44:44just like if i you know agree to go on a44:46date it doesn’t mean that you’re coming44:47back to my place later44:49so there’s a lot of steps in between and44:52there’s a lot of different44:53uh uses of information that should be44:55considered so full consent i think is44:57also really important when it comes to44:58data security and privacy and making45:00sure that there’s45:03the ability to consent to maybe some45:04uses of information but not all uses of45:07information45:08um i think that’s a really important45:10aspect that45:12can get overlooked sometimes the other45:14act yeah the information is used right45:16like45:17exactly it was an example that i had45:19written and i shared with shane with you45:21i think on twitter that i had written a45:23piece a few years ago45:24that was talking about um foursquare45:27knowing that i was at a bar45:29that i never searched for on foursquare45:31or on google or in any way shape or form45:33i didn’t even know the name of the bar45:34because i was going with a friend we45:36were going after an event and we walked45:37over to this bar he knew it45:39and then in the morning i got an email45:40from foursquare saying what did you45:42think45:42of name of bar it was just like what i45:46don’t i45:46until this moment i didn’t even know45:47what the bar was called and it just45:49seemed so45:50yeah it seemed so creepy and invasive to45:53me and what it what it made me think45:54about was that45:55um you know rape culture is so much45:58about45:58the the um where accountability and46:02power46:03resides and the fact that you know these46:05these46:06companies like foursquare and others46:08that are tracking your location even if46:10you’ve46:10said i i don’t want you tracking it46:12unless i’ve given you46:14the incentive or you know the the ask46:16right then and there like unless i’ve46:18said i want you tracking this i want to46:19know46:20you know where i am or where i’m going46:22or whatever and they’re tracking it in46:23the background46:24you know at least the common courtesy46:27not to tell me that you’ve46:29you’ve tracked it and so i just think46:30it’s a it’s a46:32whole disconnect around the way that46:35i think the value that the companies46:38that are collecting this data think that46:39they’re offering46:40versus what people on the other side of46:42the interaction believe the value to be46:44and then the assertion of power and46:47dominance in ways that are46:48really weird and wrong and and so yeah i46:51think it’s a really important46:52uh point that shea has brought up here i46:55agree and i think there’s actually some46:56broader parallels you can draw46:58from that to to privacy in general like47:00just because i consent for47:02one company to use certain information47:04about me and in one way doesn’t mean47:06that i can send to all companies that do47:08that service47:09to do the same thing right you know it’s47:11specific it’s to this one company that47:13i’m47:13purposely interacting with it doesn’t47:15mean that i’m okay with it in all other47:17contexts47:18and it also doesn’t necessarily mean47:20that i’m always okay with that company47:23using my information over and over you47:25know it can like47:26if i go on a date with one person that47:29doesn’t guarantee that i will go on a47:30date with them forever anytime they feel47:32like it means that47:33you have to keep checking yeah um47:37and so i think i think the47:38responsibility to follow up and to be47:40clear47:40on exactly what is being permitted is is47:44a carryover47:45absolutely so um a follow-up question47:48from47:49jenna jordan in the comments is is data47:51ownership a necessary precondition to47:53true47:54fully empowered consent though47:57that’s a really interesting question i48:00don’t know if it’s48:01ownership the thing that bothers me well48:04the thing i already gave a list of48:05things48:06one of the things that bothers me a48:07little bit about thinking of48:09data as a physical tangible good that we48:12own48:13is that that just doesn’t track with the48:14nature of it48:16it’s it’s kind of an48:19a renewable resource that way it doesn’t48:22it’s it’s not like this one thing that i48:23give this one time it’s this constantly48:25regenerating resource there’s always48:27more information about me and if i share48:29it with one person that doesn’t preclude48:31me from sharing it with other people48:33and there’s different limitations on it48:35than there would be on like a physical48:36object and in addition the ownership48:38factor i think48:42puts different parameters and48:43responsibilities on the parties involved48:45that i don’t necessarily think48:47perfectly correlate i absolutely get why48:49we constantly use it as48:51you know data as property because that’s48:54that’s just a much easier way to48:55understand it48:56the the difficult thing about48:58information49:00and part of frankly why privacy law is49:02constantly fluctuating and is such a49:05kind of squishy area of law in some ways49:08is that it49:08it just doesn’t perfectly map onto49:11property law it49:12it intersects constantly but it doesn’t49:15perfectly map49:16and it doesn’t perfectly map onto issues49:18of you know49:20contract law and liability and all of49:22that it touches all these different49:24areas but it doesn’t perfectly form into49:26anything49:28um49:33we’ve been talking for too many years49:35about data as the new oil and49:36you know there are these kind of49:38concepts of data lakes and and that sort49:40of thing but49:40there’s not those metaphors only go so49:43far and they only make so much sense49:46and i think you know data as property49:48that you can own and you can barter and49:49you can49:50you know commodify i think as we can49:53pretty clearly see when you start to49:54model it out only really works when49:56you’re talking about49:57in the aggregate as it’s monetized by a50:00corporation like facebook as opposed to50:02by an individual50:04in their own interest i agree i do think50:07to the core question50:08thinking of it as like if someone’s50:10getting consent from me for my50:12information that implies i own the50:13information i think that’s accurate it’s50:15just it’s not ownership in the same way50:17as you would own a physical good50:19like it is mine it comes from me it’s50:22about me50:23but it’s not the same as saying like my50:26house or my dogs or50:27or whatever um so i i don’t think that50:31assertion’s wrong at all i think that’s50:33correct like for consent to work you50:35have to go50:36from the base assumption that it’s50:38because it’s50:39of me and connected to me i’m the one50:42that gets to say whether you use it or50:44not50:45but i again it just it doesn’t perfectly50:47correlate when it comes to things like50:49sale or or ownership in the traditional50:52sense that way50:53yeah yeah it makes sense no i think it’s50:56an important thing that50:57you know this this is why we don’t have50:59very good metaphors for this because i51:00think there aren’t enough discussions51:02that are happening across51:03you know disciplines and considerations51:06so i think it’s51:07um it’s really healthy to to keep51:09talking about it so that we can find out51:11what the nuances are and and dive into51:13them so51:14i know we’re getting uh kind of close to51:16our hour here so i want to make sure51:18that we51:19um we get to the chance to to what i51:21think is a51:22really important question is that in my51:25work51:25around this tech humanist concept i’m51:27always trying to think about51:29how we built the best futures for the51:31most people and51:32i i wonder what you think we can do51:35around data privacy law in culture51:38to to stand a better chance of bringing51:41about the best futures51:45i think51:48i think education and empowerment are51:50both really important so51:51keeping the discussion about privacy as51:54a prominent thing51:55and and continually bringing it up and51:58kind of keeping it at the forefront of51:59people’s minds you know the52:01the other tricky thing about privacy is52:02that it’s something that’s never really52:04done52:05i mean you don’t you don’t finally52:07figure it out and like52:08check a box or send in a form and then52:11you’re done with privacy and you don’t52:12have to deal with it anymore it’s an52:13ongoing thing it’s kind of like52:16uh this is also a sad metaphor because52:19of52:19quarantine but it’s kind of like fitness52:21you know i52:23if i if i want to stay on top of it i52:25have to keep doing it i don’t get to52:27just hit a set point where i’m like52:28awesome52:29did done never have to go to the gym52:31again52:32like you have to maintain and and52:35that’s particularly true of privacy52:37because it involves tech that’s52:38constantly evolving and constantly52:40changing52:40and and regulations that are constantly52:43evolving and changing52:44um i think to make and i’m going to52:46interject and just say i think it’s a52:48challenge to us individually too because52:50we’re constantly being bombarded with52:52opportunities to participate52:53in things and share things and uh52:56divulge things about ourselves and make52:58different trade-offs and and53:00compromises that we have to evaluate on53:03the fly53:03and most people don’t have the big53:06picture to be able to make that decision53:08in as sophisticated a way as they need53:10to53:11yeah i think that’s absolutely true i53:13think for a bigger picture53:14you know trying to make the future53:16better for people when it comes to53:17privacy53:19you have to keep advocating really hard53:21um53:23you know i i i don’t know her last name53:26because it’s twitter but eva made a joke53:27the other day that53:29uh she doesn’t like being referred to as53:31a tireless privacy defender because53:32she’s like i’m tired i’m very tired i53:34would like a nap53:36um and it’s true you know you it does53:39get really tiring because it can feel a53:40little bit like you’re kind of pounding53:42your head against a wall53:43it just keeps on creeping closer to you53:45and53:46there’s there’s only so much you can do53:47but it is valuable and i think it53:50it’s important to keep in mind that53:51advocacy is is what53:53keeps protect what protections we have53:55in place53:56and it’s what pushes for regulations and53:58changes in privacy and it’s what54:01helps protect people and their54:03information and i think keeping the54:05perspective of this isn’t just for me54:07because i’m uncomfortable with alexa54:10listening to me or whatever it’s54:12it’s for people that are in more54:14vulnerable population groups it’s for54:16kids that are developing a sense of self54:18and need to be able to do that safely54:20and it’s for54:21um you know lgbtq and non-binary and54:25trans youth who who would face actual54:27danger54:28if privacy keeps getting reduced and um54:31people in in refugee communities and in54:34you know54:34uh activists that that get tracked it’s54:37it’s54:38thinking of privacy as something that54:40you fight for not just for yourself i54:41think really keeps things moving forward54:43and keeps the importance of it54:45to the forefront of your mind i think54:47it’s easy to get hung up in the like54:48well54:49what do i do i just do paperwork all day54:51every day i write54:53privacy policies nobody ever reads and i54:56i do a bunch of contract renegotiation54:59and reread laws that no one cares about55:01but but it does matter and it does make55:03a difference and i think keeping that in55:05the forefront of your mind really55:07improves things for the future and and55:09provides motivation for us to keep going55:13so that’s that’s really my biggest55:15takeaway55:16that’s a beautiful uh takeaway i think55:18privacy as advocacy55:20and thinking of it you know in the55:21biggest most interconnected sense55:23is is a beautiful way to to close this55:25out so cali schrader thank you so much55:28for joining us for the tech humanist55:30show55:30thanks to everyone who watched live and55:32offered comments uh55:34and questions and uh thanks to all the55:36listeners55:37out there uh please go ahead and55:39subscribe comment like wherever you see55:41this55:42and um please tell your friends about it55:44thanks again calli55:45and we’ll see you next time no problem55:47thank you so much for having me

