There is some good stuff here, but I feel there are some people that speak on this podcast that are a bit simplistic in their approach, and make no room for nuance. And when explaining positions other than their own, there is this tendency to explain things in a way that isn’t really fair to that position. They represent an opposing position with the sole purpose of tearing it to shreds. It, in my opinion, shows not only a superficial knowledge of other positions, but it also shows they have a superficial understanding of their own. There are some issues where it shows the speakers haven’t really done their homework or wrestled over a topic, although, they think they have.