Following on from our introductory episode this second and final part (for now!) considers:

• What is it that Province is advocating for the Inclusionary Housing policy – isn’t it just another method of taxation?
• What are the negotiable variables and thresholds that have been used in Joburg?
• Why do the NGOs suggest that micro-units aren’t helpful in the Inclusionary Housing debate?
• How has the language and skill sets of contemporary planners been challenged by the Inclusionary Housing negotiations on policy and applications?
• What have been the unintended and unresolved aspects from the Joburg experience?
• How have the tribunals who adjudicate on applications responded?
• What the response to the Provincial policy been so far?
• What does the research in SA since 2007 tell us?

Our guests are Eric Raboshakga, City of Johannesburg, Dylan Weakley Senior Specialist: Strategic Urban Planner, City of Johannesburg; Lorraine Nzimande: Masters Graduate University of Witwatersrand and former CoJ; Robyn Park-Ross, researcher, Ndifuna Ukwazi; Willard Matiashe Lead Researcher, Development Action Group; and Catherine Stone Director Spatial Planning (Western Cape Provincial Government.

There’s still an opportunity to respond to the Provincial policy via: https://www.westerncape.gov.za/eadp/news/western-cape-inclusionary-housing-policy-framework-open-comment

Learn more about Ndifuna Ukwazi’s perspective and position: https://jumpshare.com/v/tid8aqhyeIQ4uNnSGS7S

Recorded 30th June 2021