In this final episode of Shared State, Montana Public Radio News Director Corin Cates-Carney, Yellowstone Public Radio News Director Nicky Oullet, and Montana Free Press Executive Director John Adams break down the results of Tuesday’s election.They answer: who won, what do the results say about Montana, and where we’re headed?

The first rule of investigative journalism is: follow the money. But tracking spending this election cycle is trickier than ever before. Montana Free Press editor-in-chief John Adams tracks the ways corruption has shaped Montana, starting in the early days, when mining drove the state’s economy and politics. That legacy still plays out today, as politicians and watchdogs grapple with increasingly complex ways of hiding the sources of political spending and advertising.

How we think about liberty and individualism shapes the fundamentals of politics: how strongly the government should figure into ordinary folks’ lives. Those ideas play a huge role in issues that run the political gamut — from managing public lands, to school choice, to social welfare programs. As November approaches, very particular perspectives on freedom and liberty are getting louder — especially as Montana officials grapple with implementing public health measures as coronavirus spikes in the state.  Montana Public Radio’s Nick Mott explores how we weigh the individual and the collective when we talk about freedom, choice and rights. 

Instead of exploring a political race or an issue on the ballot, this time on Shared State we’re looking at voting itself  — our democratic process in Montana. In 2020, there’s more uncertainty than ever about how to ensure we all have a say in this election. But in some ways, this uncertainty is nothing new. As long as Montana has held elections, there have been groups pushing to have their equal voice heard.

Pledging to bring Montana more “good-paying jobs” is a time-honored cliche for politicians on the campaign trail. And for good reason: the isolation factor that defines the state’s rural economy means Montana workers often face low wages and limited career options. But what exactly can elected officials like the governor do to expand economic opportunity for Montanans? And  what concerns are Montanans weighing as they decide whether they can build the life they want here? 

National parks, jagged peaks, sprawling forests ... Montana is home to more than 30 million acres of public land. Our shared lands are beloved by many Montanans — and a huge draw for tourists from around the world. But just because those lands exist doesn’t mean people can actually get to them. When public land and private property collide, real conflicts over access arise.  And that’s a sticking point in this year’s race for governor. Montana Public Radio’s Charles Bolte explores what candidates are really talking about when they say they’re “for access,” and if that political rhetoric matches up with the issues Montanans are facing. 

Nearly 50 years ago, a group of Montanans pushed for strong environmental protections and the right to “a clean and healthful environment.” What they created was groundbreaking. Only about a half-dozen other states recognize environmental rights in their constitutions, and Montana is the only state that calls that right “inalienable.”  In this episode, Yellowstone Public Radio reporter Rachel Cramer dives into the events at the 1972 constitutional convention and how one aspect of our shared environment — public lands ‚ is playing out in the Senate race. When politicians talk about protecting our outdoor heritage in Montana, what exactly are they protecting, and whose interests are they serving?

Delegates included a nod to religion when they wrote Montana’s constitutional preamble. Decades later, ideas about God, faith and morality continue to influence how lawmakers approach policy issues, from access to abortion and civil rights for LGBTQ people, to debates over religious freedom.  This year, Montana’s Republican and Democratic candidates for governor are approaching these topics with different perspectives and religious philosophies. Depending on the outcome of the election, the political realities around these issues could change. 

Every election cycle, politicians flaunt their Montana roots—or attack their opponents for their lack of them. This focus on so-called "authenticity" might make voters laugh or roll their eyes, but it's just the surface layer of a complicated dynamic. For some, it's supposedly a way to figure out who's trustworthy, who's acting in the public interest, and who doesn't belong. Montana Free Press's Brad Tyer explores this popular trope in Montana politics, and asks: when we say "We the people of Montana," who do we really mean?

Campaign season is here, and we’re in the thick of it. Politicians are on the airwaves claiming how their candidacies best reflect “Montana values.” But behind the political promises and rhetoric, there are actual policies up for debate. We’re talking about what’s really on the ballot in November — not just the contenders, but also the issues they stand for and argue over. Along the way, we’ll try to answer a few questions: What are Montana values? How are they changing? And how are they playing out in this election? We’re digging deep into Montana’s political landscape—from our constitution to the current slate of candidates running for office, to why this election matters.