Questioning Medicine
Questioning Medicine
Questioning Medicine
169. COVID19, Combined Oral Contraception and DVT, Colon Capsule Endoscopy
19 minutes Posted Feb 10, 2021 at 12:20 am.
0:00
19:37
Download MP3
Show notes
Also ask yourself, did this study compare their treatment to the 'gold standard' and if the answer is no they compared it to a straw man, then think big Pharma, or authors that needed publication for their job. We can't treat what we don't know exist and 30-50% of the time COVID19 is asymptomatic. Combined Oral Contraception DO NOT have an increase risk of DVT and long term the risk are very minimal if a DVT does develop while on COC.
Speaking of studies that should have never been done- Multicentre, prospective, randomised study comparing the diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in a screening population (the TOPAZ study) | Gut (bmj.com)
Diagnostic Yield of Colon Capsule Endoscopy vs CT Colonography in a Screening Population | PracticeUpdate
The authors of this multicenter, prospective, randomized study compared the diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) with that of CT colonography (CTC) for colon cancer screening in an average-risk adult population.
First you had either a CCE or a CTC and then the findings were confirmed with colonoscopy.
The sensitivity and specificity of CCE for polyps ≥6 mm were 79.2% and 96.3%, respectively, compared with 26.8% and 98.9%, respectively, with CTC. The sensitivity and specificity of CCE for polyps ≥10 mm were 85.7% and 98.2%, respectively, compared with 50% and 99.1%, respectively, with CTC.
They authors say this may work for people who refuse colonoscopy. Which is true it might but we have a fit test—it cost pennies—why in the world do we need this test?!? Its more money its more invasive its not better than FIT…..
This is a study we didn’t need
till I read the 30 line conflict of interest and I knew exactly why we needed this trial—to keep big pharm in business
Colon cancer is scary cause most of the time we don’t know we have it and speaking of thigs we don’t know we have
Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among Persons Entering China From April 16 to October 12, 2020 | Global Health | JAMA | JAMA Network
China controlled their cases because
Beginning April 1, 2020, persons entering China via air, sea, or land have been mandatorily tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR test at border checkpoints.
retrospective cohort study looked at All international entrants found to have SARS-CoV-2 infection via a positive PCR test result at China’s border checkpoints from April 16 to October 12 were included in this study.
3103 had confirmed COVID-19 cases, AMONG THOSE 1612 (51.9%) never developed symptoms through day 13 and were considered to have asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The Proportion of SARS-CoV-2 Infections That Are Asymptomatic: A Systematic Review: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 0, No 0 (acpjournals.org)
Purpose:
To estimate the proportion of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 who never develop symptoms.
And results found- about 1/3 of people had no symptoms and if you test positive and have no symptoms then about 75% of the time you will never have symptoms. WE will never be able to stop what we don’t even know about. WE can never and I repeat NEVER flatten a curve on something that you may not even know you have 33% of the time.
Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for the treatment of back pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis | The BMJ
Prescribe antidepressants for depression not for pain
Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for back and osteoarthritis pain compared with placebo.
Pain and disability were primary outcomes. Pain and disability scores were converted to a scale of 0 (no pain or disability) to 100 (worst pain or disability).
Results 33 trials (5318 participants) were included.
Back pain-
serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) reduced back pain (mean difference −5.30, 95%(continued)