Has Donald Trump permanently changed American politics? On this episode, Kirby joins Todd as a guest alongside his son and co-author, Spencer Goidel, a Texas A&M doctoral graduate and assistant professor of political science at Auburn University, to discuss their book, “The Trump Realignment.” The conversation explores Trump’s effect on the party system, what political realignment means and where American politics may go from here. For more on this show and to listen to past episodes, visit tx.ag/InsidePoliticalScience.

Why is gambling now a public concern? Join Kirby and Todd alongside special guests Matt Motta and Tim Callaghan, associate professors in the Department of Health Law, Policy and Management at Boston University, for a conversation about prediction markets, gambling, public health and democracy. From election forecasting to insider trading and gambling addiction, this episode explores one of the fastest-growing and most controversial developments in American politics. For more on this show and to listen to past episodes, visit tx.ag/InsidePoliticalScience.

Is this the year Texas turns blue? How do certain concerns voters have affect favorability numbers on certain candidates? Join Kirby and special guest Brandon Rottinghaus, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Houston and leading expert in Texas politics, as they break down the context behind the Texas Pulse Poll data. For more on this show and to listen to past episodes, visit tx.ag/InsidePoliticalScience.

How has nuclear politics changed the game? What does it mean to use nuclear weapons defensively and offensively? Join Kirby as he digs deep to find the answers to these questions through the history of international nuclear weaponry with Texas A&M professor and expert Matt Furhmann. For more on this show and to listen to past episodes, visit tx.ag/insidepoliticalscience.

What does it mean to be a legitimate institution? Are government institutions still representing citizens? In this episode, Kirby sits down with Soren Jordan, associate professor at The Bush School of Government & Public Service, to discuss how science guides political methodology. Soren emphasizes the importance of data interpretation and representation, noting that representation is essential for gathering accurate data, but what does it mean to be represented? If meaningful representation is lacking, does that mean the system is broken? Later, they explore the values that drive public policy, with Soren arguing that politics reflects values. As those values shift, Kirby questions whether the legitimacy of the government changes with it. He adds that many Americans like the idea of democracy, but are not satisfied with how it’s currently functioning. So, does a governmental institution’s legitimacy depend on the people? For more on this show and to listen to past episodes, visit tx.ag/insidepoliticalscience.

What is presidential greatness? Does it even exist? Kirby and Todd sit down with Texas A&M former student and co-director of the Presidential Greatness Project, Justin Vaughn, to explore patterns among highly rated presidents and the power of their terms. The hosts pose the question: what makes a president “great?” Vaughn shares his research, noting that the consensus is evolving. While a “great” presidential run has traditionally been marked by policy change and broad impact, there is a growing emphasis on a president’s commitment to democratic norms and honorable leadership. Later, the group discusses the unique pressures and obstacles presidents face, and how those factors shape their reputation. Vaughn says a clear indicator of presidential greatness is whether or not the presidential successor is willing to embrace and build upon the legacy left behind. For more on this show and to listen to past episodes, visit tx.ag/insidepoliticalscience.

Between the recent U.S. Senate primary elections and the developing conflict with Iran, tensions are rising in Washington, D.C. That begs the question: what power does President Trump hold, and does he have the support of the American people? Kirby and Todd agree that U.S. citizens do not seem to be backing the President’s choice to ignite war in the same way they have in the past. The two argue that presidents seem to face less constraint in foreign relations than in domestic affairs. At the same time, recent U.S. Senate primaries suggest that the President’s endorsements seem to be the predictor of who wins within the party. Kirby and Todd question whether Texas has the potential to turn blue as U.S. Senate Democratic candidate James Talarico gains popularity. Does he pose a threat to the Texas Republican Party? The hosts also discuss the pros and cons of presidential appointments and the interests of each political party when selecting politicians for those roles. Tune in to hear how power, primaries, and the politics of war will continue to shape the U.S. For more on this show and to listen to past episodes, visit tx.ag/insidepoliticalscience.

Democracy is evidently changing, and so is the field of journalism. In this episode, Kirby and Todd are joined by Axios’ Senior Contributor and Director of the Syracuse University Institute for Democracy, Journalism and Citizenship Maragaret Talev to discuss how journalism and democracy go hand-in-hand. The former White House correspondent argues that now, more than ever, many politicians are bypassing the news filter, changing journalism’s role in politics. With evolving forms of media and an overwhelming amount of information, Kirby questions how mainstream news outlets can remain relevant and stay in business. Later, Talev argues that censorship shows the “poor health of democracy.” She emphasizes the idea that it is a personal responsibility to be media literate. The professors agree that local news is crucial to political participation and fostering a deep sense of community. Despite the crisis facing journalism and democracy, Talev says there is hope for a brighter future. For more on this show and to listen to past episodes, visit tx.ag/insidepoliticalscience.

What’s the Federal Reserve, and how does it function? Join Kirby and Todd as they sit down with Texas A&M professor Bill Clark to learn about the significance of The Fed and how it affects our economy. Although the institution is said to operate independently from the government, Clark says the Federal Reserve is actually “partially independent,” with dependence on policymakers like Congress and the President. The professors explain that the economy is the institution’s main focus when maintaining balance. Clark refers to the Republican Party as “inflation hawks,” whose main focus is to decrease inflation, and the Democratic Party as “fiscally liberal,” whose main focus is to reduce unemployment rates. Later, they discuss the framework of the Federal Reserve, emphasizing that it is a system made up of Federal Reserve Banks across the nation that provide more representative feedback for the economy. For more on this show and to listen to past episodes, visit tx.ag/insidepoliticalscience.

Kirby and Todd are back for another semester with new topics beyond the realm of politics! In this episode, they invite Keith Gaddie, author of Bragging Rites: College Football’s Titles, and an expert on the politics of football within the Southeastern Conference. With the implementation of NIL rights, the NCAA transfer portal and the post-season systems, are we past the point of no return? Although athletes are being valued and properly compensated, are they losing sight of the value of their studies? Loyalties towards schools seem to be a thing of the past. Can Congress step in? The professors suggest an easy solution, but don’t think Congress will step in anytime soon. Later, they compare the current conditions of college sports to the past and argue that, in some ways, change is for the better. For more on this show and to listen to past episodes, visit tx.ag/insidepoliticalscience.