The New Jersey attorney general created a strike force to investigate pro-life pregnancy centers.One of those centers received a subpoena demanding ten years of private donor records.No complaints had been filed. No fraud had been alleged.The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously in the pregnancy center's favor.Twenty-four hours later, the state found a way to keep fighting anyway.That is just one case.In New York and California, attorneys general are trying to silence pregnancy centers for simply telling women that abortion pill reversal exists. In Louisiana, a woman's ex-boyfriend ordered mifepristone online and coerced her to take it. And the drug whose label says one in twenty-five women will end up in the emergency room is now available to anyone with a few minutes and an internet connection.Gabriella McIntyre is an attorney with the Alliance Defending Freedom. She joins Dear Jane to walk through all of it, the cases, the creative tactics, the real stories behind the headlines, and answer the question most people are left with at the end:What can the rest of us actually do about any of this?

What happens to the human embryos that are never chosen?Emma Waters has spent years asking that question. A researcher at the Heritage Foundation and the author of the forthcoming book, Rethinking Fertility, she joins Dear Jane to talk about the 1.5 million frozen embryos currently in storage across the United States, human beings suspended in time, some for decades, and the fertility industry that created them with fragmented regulatory oversight.Emma breaks down how genetic screening allows parents to test embryos for everything from Down syndrome to IQ, personality traits, and male pattern baldness, selecting which lives continue and which are destroyed. She also covers a federal class action lawsuit filed in California in 2025, where a woman destroyed her last remaining embryos based on a 98% reliability statistic that turned out to be scientifically unsupported.And she asks the harder question underneath all of it: how did a $35 billion industry with the power to make these decisions end up answering to almost no one?

What happens when you stop waiting for Washington to fix things and start building the solution yourself?Anton Krecic left political fundraising convinced that policy alone wasn't enough to end abortion. So he started Seven Weeks Coffee, named after a question his wife asked: When is a baby the size of a coffee bean? The answer is at seven weeks, the same point when a heartbeat can often be detected on ultrasound. The mission followed naturally: give 10% of every sale to pregnancy care centers and build it unapologetically pro-life from day one.Nearly $2 million in donations later, he joins Dear Jane to talk about boldness in the marketplace, what the parable of the talents can teach entrepreneurs, and why the pro-life movement needs more Christians building businesses. He also weighs in on the difference between being humble and passivity, the importance of unifying within the pro-life movement, and how he would respond if Starbucks came calling.Timestamps:1:00 — The Idea Behind Seven Weeks: Mission, Name, and Giving Back4:50 — From Political Fundraising to Pro-Life Business7:40 — Why For-Profit Can Be a Force for Good8:40 — Christians in the Marketplace: Excellence as a Calling10:13 — The Quality Behind the Coffee: Sourcing and Standards11:30 — Advice for Mission-Driven Entrepreneurs15:00 — What Holds Christians Back from Bold Business16:30 — Prioritizing Pro-Life Partners in Business18:40 — There Is a Market for Values19:30 — Be Proud, Be Bold, Be Unapologetic23:40 — Unity Over Division: Navigating Internal Pro-Life Debates26:06 — Fake Reviews and the Overwhelming Pro-Life Response27:30 — What Is Next for Seven Weeks Coffee28:25 — What Anton Would Say to Starbucks

What if the reason most women choose abortion isn't because they want one, but because they don't feel like they have any other options? Emily Berning of Let Them Live has seen it firsthand: when you remove the financial pressure, the isolation, and the panic, 98% of abortion-minded women choose life. Not because they were lectured or given platitudes, but because someone actually met their needs. In this episode, Emily breaks down what a true funded alternative to abortion looks like: immediate support, mid-term stability, long-term independence. She makes the case that the pro-life movement can't only fight to end abortion without funding the alternative. The church, employers—and yes, even the government—all have a role to play. This isn't a theoretical solution. It's happening right now. And it works. If you're pro-life and you're serious about saving lives, this conversation will inspire and challenge how you think about what "winning" actually requires.

Jesse Ridgway, known online as "McJuggerNuggets", recently shared that he and his wife aborted their unborn son after he was diagnosed with Trisomy 21, also known as Down syndrome. The Ridgway's viral announcement sparked a much bigger conversation about abortion, disability, and the sinister role of eugenics in abortion decisions. In this episode, we talk about why a Down syndrome diagnosis so often changes how parents decide the value of their child’s life. We also expose what happens when technology is used to identify genetic conditions before birth and abortion becomes the expected next step being pushed relentlessly by doctors. Our conversation isn't just about one influencer's tragic abortion decision. It is about the growing pressure to decide who is worth welcoming into the world based on a test result.

Some commenters said unborn children have no more value than sperm. Others claimed no one is truly pro-abortion, abortion regret does not matter, and the abortion pill is safer than Tylenol.This video dives into a candid and often intense abortion debate, exploring differing views on the value of unborn life and the concept of abortion as health care. We respond to some of the most revealing, frustrating, and widely repeated reactions to recent episodes, then turn to the growing debate over equal protection and whether pregnancy help centers could be affected by mandatory reporting laws.Scott and Marcie discuss:◼ Why abortion regret may be a weaker pro-life argument than many people realize◼ What happens when human value is based on intelligence, ability, or personhood◼ What a new legal memo says about equal protection and pregnancy help centers◼ Whether enforcement concerns are enough to reject equal protection legislation◼ Why one of the hosts says she is slowly moving toward equal protectionEQUAL PROTECTION MEMORANDUM: https://faa.app.box.com/v/PHC-reporting Follow The Dear Jane Podcast:Website - https://dearjane.orgInstagram - https://instagram.com/dearjanepodcastFacebook - https://facebook.com/dearjanepodcast

Breanne Houston had an abortion at eighteen. Today she sits on the other side of the room, helping women in the exact moment she once lived. And she holds a view most people don't expect from someone with her story. She believes women who get abortions should be held liable.In Part 2 of our equal protection series, Breanne joins Marcie and Scott to make her case, from the terminology people get wrong, to the line between pressure and coercion, to what it would actually mean to treat abortion the way we treat any other taking of life. It's an honest, uncomfortable, real-world conversation about one of the most divisive questions inside the pro-life movement, told by someone who has lived both sides of it.ABOUT THE GUESTBreanne Houston helps lead Alliance Family Services and is launching a new pro-life clinic in Lenoir City, Tennessee, serving women facing unexpected pregnancies with free ultrasounds, abortion pill reversal, and long-term support. https://www.alliancefamilyservices.org/WHAT WE GET INTOWhat "equal protection" really means, and why the words matterThe difference between pressure and coercionHow prosecuting women would affect pregnancy centers and abortion pill reversal.Whether it would drive abortion further into the dark, or stop itThe committee room moment that crystallized all of it for Breanne

She's been through it herself and she doesn't believe women should be prosecuted for abortion. In this episode of Dear Jane, post-abortive advocate Victoria Robinson sits down with Scott and Marcie to debate why she believes criminalizing women misses the deeper realities behind abortion decisions. Drawing from her own story and years of working with post-abortive women, Victoria unpacks the role of coercion, shame, guilt, and accountability in the abortion debate.In this episode:-Why Victoria opposes criminalizing women for abortion-What coercion really looks like behind abortion decisions-How guilt shapes the experience of post-abortive women-Whether criminalization would actually protect preborn children🎙️ Guest: Victoria Robinson — post-abortive advocate and spokesperson for women navigating life after abortion📌 This is Part 1 of 2. Next week, hear the other side: post-abortive leader Breanne Houston explains why she now believes criminalization IS necessary to protect preborn children. Subscribe so you don't miss it.🎧 Listen to Dear Jane wherever you get your podcasts.📩 Have a story to share? Reach out at https://dearjane.org/

What happens to infants who survive abortions? Is infanticide happening in America — and why is nobody talking about it?Olivia Summer, Senior Litigation Counsel with the ACLJ, exposes the legal loopholes, redefined language, and blocked investigations that critics argue allow born-alive infants to die without consequence.⚠️ To be clear: Infanticide is illegal in all 50 states. This episode examines whether legal changes are creating dangerous gaps that allow born-alive infants to die without investigation or consequence.In this episode:• What "infanticide" actually means and what it doesn't• The difference between "comfort care" and lifesaving medical care for abortion survivors• How legal language around "perinatal" death is being rewritten• Why investigations into infant deaths are being blocked• The rise of unsupervised abortion pill use and its deadly consequences• What happens to babies who are born alive after failed abortions👇 ResourcesWebsite: American Center for Law and JusticeYouTube: youtube.com/@OfficialACLJ Instagram: instagram.com/acljofficial Facebook: facebook.com/theACLJX: x.com/ACLJ🔔 Subscribe & turn on notifications!

This week’s headlines are hard to ignore.A newly released DOJ report is raising serious questions about how the FACE Act was used and whether pro-life Americans were unfairly targeted. At the same time, troubling stories out of Canada show patients being encouraged toward euthanasia, even before receiving a full diagnosis.Also, during a recent congressional hearing, one simple question about abortion stopped the conversation cold.Scott and Marcie walk through these stories, what is being said, what is not, and why it all matters right now.Subscribe to Dear Jane for weekly conversations you will not hear anywhere else.