Most contractors hire a business developer on one trait. Then they wait a year to find out it didn't work. Neal Glatt is a sales and leadership coach who helps companies hire and develop salespeople. He explains what to test before you make the offer, and how to know within six months whether a new BD hire will pan out. Takeaways: - Industry experience alone is a poor reason to hire a salesperson. Neal's assessment looks at more than 220 data points - If you can't write your sales process on one page as stages and steps, you have a process problem - Build your process from the best sale you ever made - Get involved six months to a year before the RFP goes out - Ask who besides the person in front of you is involved in the final decision - Run a five-minute phone screen and watch what the candidate does when you cut them off   Connect with Neal Glatt: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nealglatt Website: https://nealglatt.com Cassidy Gutter on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/cassidy-gutter-4a007822a   The Shift Leadership Course: https://theshift.constructiongenius.com  

You pay the Christmas bonuses. Then January hits, more job costs come in, and the profit you paid them on starts to shrink. In part nine of the construction accounting series, Kathe Barrington, CPA, of KB CPA walks through a contractor's year-end close. She covers how to test your numbers before you spend, distribute or pay bonuses on them.   Takeaways: Year-end prep starts in January. A hard close tells you which SOPs need work Check December's closed jobs against January's job costs. Costs still landing means you closed too early Take job losses as soon as you know them. Be conservative on pending change orders Internal financials that don't match your reviewed statement cost you credibility with your bank and surety Get Q3 right, pick the jobs you'll close by December 31, and get the numbers to your tax person in October   Kathe also tells the story of a job that took 11 years to close out.   The full Construction Accounting Series with Kathe Barrington: Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNqgaQ0mEF1w Ep. 357 WIP Reports Made Simple: https://www.constructiongenius.com/wip-reports-made-simple-the-key-to-stopping-hidden-job-losses-ep.-357 Ep. 359 Use Your WIP to Protect Cash: https://www.constructiongenius.com/how-to-use-your-wip-to-protect-cash-and-grow-profitability-ep.-359 Ep. 364 Physical Progress vs. Financial Reporting: https://www.constructiongenius.com/physical-progress-vs.-financial-reporting-in-construction-projects-ep.-364 Ep. 368 Underbillings Bad. Overbillings Better: https://www.constructiongenius.com/underbillings-bad-overbillings-better-the-cash-flow-truth-construction-owners-cant-ignore-ep.-368 Ep. 377 Why Your Jobs Look More Profitable Than They Are: https://www.constructiongenius.com/why-your-jobs-look-more-profitable-than-they-are-indirect-allocations-and-overhead-in-construction-ep.-377 Ep. 388 Read Your Backlog Like a Banker: https://www.constructiongenius.com/how-to-read-your-backlog-like-a-banker Ep. 396 Grow Bonding Capacity: https://constructiongenius.com/grow-bonding-capacity-banking-tax-moves-contractors/ Ep. 400 Projections: https://www.constructiongenius.com/construction-projections-cash-flow-margin-kathe-barrington Connect with Kathe Barrington: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kathe-barrington-a6346337 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/p/Kathe-Barrington-CPA-100072271041746 KB CPA: https://kbcpa.biz  

Suffolk and MIT just released a white paper on AI in construction. It estimates 17 to 20% in potential cost savings and 22 to 25% on schedule. In this solo episode, Eric Anderton reads it for a contractor running a $25 to $500 million company and pulls out the applications worth testing now. He also explains where those numbers came from before you expect them on your next job. Takeaways: Many field production problems get locked in during design, months before the crew shows up Design changes hit quantities, purchasing and installation. AI could get those effects onto the schedule sooner A contractor is using AI to turn hundreds of schedule activities into a three-week look-ahead with a risk list Tie your procurement log and lead times to the schedule so a late delivery flags the work it puts at risk None of it works without accurate project data and someone who owns the decision Connect with Eric Anderton: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andertoneric   Read the report: Construction in the Age of AI, from Suffolk and MIT https://suffolk.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Suffolk_MIT_AI_Whitepaper_FINAL.pdf  

A $20 million project lands in your lap with three or four red flags attached. You want the revenue. You want the backlog. In this solo episode, Eric Anderton walks through the three-for-three test he uses with his coaching clients: right client, right project, right location. He also tackles a harder problem. What do you do with a technically excellent superintendent whose behavior no longer matches your company's values? Two decisions, and Eric shows you exactly how they can start reinforcing each other if you let them. Takeaways: - Why profit history matters more than revenue when deciding which projects to take again - The three-for-three test for qualifying clients, projects, and locations - How to define a seat by its outcomes and behaviors before judging the person in it - The three real options for a values mismatch: train, move, or fire - Why the size of the number never fixes the size of the risk   Connect with Eric Anderton: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andertoneric   If you want the full niche analysis spreadsheet Eric uses with his coaching clients, email [email protected] with "Niche Analysis" in the subject line.

Your WIP shows today. Your backlog shows what's booked. Neither tells you where your cash and crews are headed. That's what projections do, and most contractors either do them badly or skip them. In Part 8 of the series, CPA Kathe Barrington shows construction owners how to build projections that actually predict trouble early. What you'll take away: Why projections belong to your CFO, and where owners still need to stay involved How far out to project (18 months internally, fiscal year-end for the bank) The job-cost bell curve, and how to plan cash, billings, and manpower around the peak Why cushion in your estimates can hurt your credibility with bank and bonding A 30-60-90 day plan to get your projections under control Kathe's line for owners who play games with their numbers: you lose the truth about your own margins, and every future estimate inherits the lie.   The full Construction Accounting Series with Kathe Barrington: Ep. 357 WIP Reports Made Simple: https://www.constructiongenius.com/wip-reports-made-simple-the-key-to-stopping-hidden-job-losses-ep.-357 Ep. 359 Use Your WIP to Protect Cash: https://www.constructiongenius.com/how-to-use-your-wip-to-protect-cash-and-grow-profitability-ep.-359 Ep. 364 Physical Progress vs. Financial Reporting: https://www.constructiongenius.com/physical-progress-vs.-financial-reporting-in-construction-projects-ep.-364 Ep. 368 Underbillings Bad. Overbillings Better: https://www.constructiongenius.com/underbillings-bad-overbillings-better-the-cash-flow-truth-construction-owners-cant-ignore-ep.-368 Ep. 377 Why Your Jobs Look More Profitable: https://www.constructiongenius.com/why-your-jobs-look-more-profitable-than-they-are-indirect-allocations-and-overhead-in-construction-ep.-377 Ep. 388 Read Your Backlog Like a Banker: https://www.constructiongenius.com/how-to-read-your-backlog-like-a-banker Ep. 396 Grow Bonding Capacity: https://constructiongenius.com/grow-bonding-capacity-banking-tax-moves-contractors/ Full playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNqgaQ0mEF1w Connect with Kathe Barrington: kbcpa.biz   

Ryan Englin, founder of Core Matters and creator of the FieldCon software platform, returns to talk about the two things most construction leaders dodge: accountability and performance reviews. Ryan and Eric get practical about why these conversations feel so hard and how to make them routine. The short version. Accountability starts with a commitment the employee actually agreed to. The longer you wait to address a problem, the more painful it gets. And the annual review is the worst way to give feedback. In this episode: - Why you can't hold someone accountable to something they never committed to - The foreman story that shows how delay turns a small issue into a confrontation - Why focusing on the agreed outcome beats focusing on the person - How to redesign reviews around the gap between self-rating and manager-rating - Running reviews monthly or quarterly so nothing is ever a surprise   Connect with Ryan Englin:  Core Matters: corematters.com  FieldCon:  fieldcon.io  LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/ryanenglin  Core Matters on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/corematters  

A superintendent's wife wakes up at 2 a.m. to find him pacing the bedroom for the third night straight. She tells him, "This isn't going to work. For anybody." That superintendent was Scott Borroughs, and the project was Deep Space, Epic Systems Systems850,000 square foot auditorium, built 80 feet down through limestone. Scott Borroughs is the Vice President of Field Operations at JP Cullen, a fifth-generation Wisconsin contractor. As general superintendent on Deep Space, he became the decision-making funnel that choked the project, then rebuilt the way he led. In this episode, we walk through how he did it, and how you can do the same without losing control of the work. What you'll learn: How to recognize when you've become the bottleneck on your own project The "banks of the river" framework: define the banks, let people flow between them How to step back from the weeds without feeling like you've stopped working What to do when your team solves a problem differently than you would How JP Cullen turned one project's lessons into ten company-wide SOPs Why you should never confuse activity with accomplishment   Connect with Scott Borroughs on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/scott-borroughs-63999a19 JP Cullen: https://jpcullen.com The Epic Systems Deep Space Auditorium project: https://jpcullen.com/portfolio/epic-deep-space-auditorium

You're a contractor, you're busy, and you're tired of LinkedIn consultants telling you that you'll be left behind if you don't embrace AI right now. Smart move to tune out the hype — but here's the catch: while you're waiting for the noise to die down, a few of your competitors are quietly using these tools to save hours every week. Not on flashy stuff. On the boring stuff. Meeting minutes, SOPs, pulling scope language out of a 200-page addendum. Dimitri Sidiropoulos is the Vice President of Delphi Plumbing and Heating, a heavy mechanical self-performing public works contractor in New York City. He's not a tech bro — he's a working contractor who decided to actually try ChatGPT for a year inside his construction company. In this conversation, Eric and Dimitri get into what works, what doesn't, where it saves him hours, where the proposal bot he tried to build had to be abandoned, and where that last 20% will nail you if you're not paying attention. If you've been waiting for someone to give you a no-hype, on-the-ground answer to "should I actually be using ChatGPT?" — grab a notepad. This is the conversation.   What you'll learn: Why the first move with AI isn't asking it to do work — it's letting it interview you How Dimitri spent three days in back-and-forth with ChatGPT to give it real context about his business The "Jarvis to Iron Man" framework: AI enhances the operator, it doesn't replace the brain Where ChatGPT shines: meeting minutes, SOPs, pulling scope from addenda, three/five/ten-year strategic planning Where it falls down: custom proposal bots, takeoffs of pipe and fittings, anything that depends on means and methods Why "80% of the way there in five minutes" beats "80% of the way there in a day and a half" How to ask AI for its sources so you can spot hallucinations early Why writing emails with AI can hurt the relationships you've built The first move on Monday morning if you're an AI-skeptic contractor   Connect with Dimitri Delphi Plumbing & Heating: www.delphiph.com Dimitri on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/dimitri-sidiropoulos-b4485190 Delphi on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/delphiph  

Every construction company answers to three masters. The bank. The bonding company. The taxman. Same financial statements, three different things they want from you. Kathe Barrington is a CPA who builds the construction accounting that bankers and bonding agents actually read. In Part 7 of our series, we work through how to stop being at the mercy of all three and get them working as one team.   What you'll learn: Why one set of books gets three different recommendations, and what to do about it How paying less tax can quietly shrink your bonding capacity Why bank and bonding both care about equity, retained earnings, and working capital How WIP accuracy and consistent margins build outside trust The one meeting almost no contractor runs, and why it changes everything Kathe Barrington is a CPA with 30+ years of experience, 20 focused on construction. Through KB CPA she is a fractional accounting resource for commercial GCs and specialty contractors that need construction-literate financial support without a full-time CFO or controller.   Connect with Kathe Barrington LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kathe-barrington-a6346337 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/p/Kathe-Barrington-CPA-100072271041746 KB CPA: https://kbcpa.biz  

Prefabrication won't save your MEP company on its own. Run it wrong and it quietly bleeds you. In this episode, Jake Olsen, CEO of Stratus, explains how to make fab actually pay off. He's a structural engineer with more than twenty years in construction and construction tech, and he's blunt about where the money goes. In this conversation you'll learn: Why prefab is really a labor strategy, and how "geographic arbitrage" keeps your crews busy Why MEP fab is neither manufacturing nor field construction, and why that matters How overproducing and carrying too much work-in-progress strands your cash Where prefab actually gets won, and it's in preconstruction, not the shop The two biggest money-losers in any fab shop: material handling and rework If you run fabrication, or you're thinking about building a shop, this episode will change how you set your expectations. Connect with Jake Olsen: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mrjakeolsen/ Learn more about Stratus: https://www.stratus.build/