Bu çalışma, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nun 1912-1913 Balkan Savaşları sırasında Doğu Ege Adaları’nı kaybetmesinde deniz gücünün zayıflığının belirleyici rolünü incelemektedir. Yunanistan'ın donanma üstünlüğü, Osmanlı’nın askeri hareket kabiliyetini kısıtlamış ve stratejik adaların işgalini kolaylaştırmıştır. Averof zırhlısının liderliğindeki Yunan Donanması, Osmanlı donanmasının etkisiz kalmasına neden olmuş ve Ege'deki güç dengelerini değiştirmiştir. Bu tarihi süreç, günümüz Türkiye’sinin deniz stratejilerinin önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Araştırma, Türk deniz gücünün tarihsel zayıflıklarının güncel stratejik doktrinlerle nasıl telafi edilmesi gerektiğine dair önemli çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.Bağlantı : ⁠ https://avim.org.tr/tr/Analiz/EGE-DEKI-DENIZ-GUCU-BALKAN-SAVASLARI-NDAN-STRATEJIK-DERSLERWeb page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/tr⁠Telegram Channel:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://t.me/s/avimorgtr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/trLinkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠VKontakte: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vk.com/public202374482⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Youtube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dailmotion: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instgram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction⁠

This study revisits the historical context and rationale behind Türkiye’s 1974 Cyprus Peace Operation, emphasizing its legal and humanitarian justifications under the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee. Contrary to narratives focused solely on military action, the analysis underscores the systematic marginalization and persecution of Turkish Cypriots that necessitated intervention. Drawing on memoirs of key figures like Rauf Denktaş and Glafkos Clerides, the paper explores the collapse of the partnership state, failed diplomatic efforts, and the enduring impact of the Megali Idea ideology. The operation is framed as a response to existential threats and a pivotal moment in Turkish-Greek-Cypriot relations.Link : ⁠ https://avim.org.tr/en/Analiz/50TH-ANNIVERSARY-OF-THE-CYPRUS-PEACE-OPERATION-WHAT-PROPOSAL-DID-THE-GREEK-SIDE-MAKE-TO-RAUF-DENKTAS-IMMEDIATELY-AFTER-THE-OPERATIONWeb page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Telegram Channel:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://t.me/s/avimorgtr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Linkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠VKontakte: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vk.com/public202374482⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Youtube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dailmotion: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instgram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction⁠

This study examines Türkiye’s evolving role as a strategic conduit between East and West in the 21st century. Positioned geographically and diplomatically at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, Türkiye actively engages in diverse international platforms such as BRICS and the G7. Its contributions to global humanitarian aid, regional stability, and migration management highlight its expanding soft power and geopolitical influence. Türkiye’s multifaceted foreign policy seeks to balance its Eastern and Western ties, positioning the country as a pivotal actor in Eurasian affairs. This dual engagement reflects Türkiye’s ambition to serve as both a regional stabilizer and global interlocutor.Link : ⁠ https://avim.org.tr/en/Yorum/Turkiye-s-Evolving-Role-as-a-Eurasian-Nexus-A-Balanced-PerspectiveWeb page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Telegram Channel:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://t.me/s/avimorgtr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Linkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠VKontakte: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vk.com/public202374482⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Youtube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dailmotion: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instgram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction⁠

This study critically examines the European Union Institute for Security Studies’ (EUISS) evolving portrayal of Türkiye in its Chaillot Papers. While previous publications characterized Türkiye as a “disruptive” actor in regions such as the Balkans, the latest Chaillot Paper No. 182 marks a notable shift by highlighting Türkiye’s growing soft and hard power as an opportunity for strategic cooperation with the EU. This reassessment reflects broader geopolitical changes and a potential recalibration of EU-Türkiye relations. The analysis underscores the importance of mutual understanding and pragmatic engagement over entrenched confrontation in shaping future regional stability.Link : ⁠https://avim.org.tr/en/Analiz/CHANGING-PERCEPTIONS-THE-EUROPEAN-UNION-INSTITUTE-AND-TURKIYE-S-ROLE-IN-EU-SECURITY-POLICYWeb page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Telegram Channel:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://t.me/s/avimorgtr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Linkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠VKontakte: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vk.com/public202374482⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Youtube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dailmotion: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instgram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction⁠

Maritime security profoundly influences state sovereignty, territorial integrity, and economic stability. This study highlights the critical role naval power played during the Balkan Wars (1912-1913), emphasizing how Greece’s naval dominance significantly contributed to the Ottoman Empire's territorial losses in the Eastern Aegean. Greece's effective maritime blockade and strategic island occupations underscore naval superiority's decisive impact. The Ottoman Empire's failure to strengthen its naval capabilities due to internal disagreements and financial constraints further intensified its vulnerability. Historical analysis reveals naval power as a vital component of national defense, illustrating contemporary implications for Türkiye’s maritime strategy and defense policy in the Aegean.Link : ⁠https://avim.org.tr/en/Analiz/NAVAL-STRENGTH-IN-THE-AEGEAN-STRATEGIC-LESSONS-FROM-THE-BALKAN-WARSWeb page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Telegram Channel:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://t.me/s/avimorgtr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Linkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠VKontakte: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vk.com/public202374482⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Youtube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dailmotion: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instgram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction⁠

This academic analysis explores the enduring strategic significance of the Turkish Straits—a vital waterway connecting the Black Sea to the Mediterranean and a key geopolitical chokepoint. The Straits, acting as a natural bridge between Europe and Asia, are central to Eurasian stability and have historically been a focal point in international strategic considerations. Highlighting Türkiye's role in managing this crucial passage, the analysis underscores the meticulous enforcement of the 1936 Montreux Straits Convention by Türkiye, especially in light of recent geopolitical challenges such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The Convention, designed to regulate navigation while ensuring regional security, is depicted as a cornerstone of peace and stability in the region. Türkiye's balanced implementation amidst war underscores its commitment to safeguarding both regional and global security interests. Moreover, the report criticizes attempts by external actors to reinterpret or challenge the Convention's provisions, arguing that such actions threaten to destabilize the established security order. It concludes by emphasizing the Montreux Convention's role as an indispensable regional and global security mechanism, warning against any efforts to undermine its authority or Türkiye's sovereign enforcement rights. Link : https://avim.org.tr/en/Analiz/EFFORTS-TO-CHANGE-OR-CIRCUMVENT-THE-PROVISIONS-OF-THE-1936-MONTREUX-STRAITS-CONVENTION Web page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Telegram Channel: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://t.me/s/avimorgtr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Linkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ VKontakte: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vk.com/public202374482⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Youtube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Dailmotion: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instgram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction⁠

Geeta Pillai and Nitish Verma's essay critically examines Wikipedia's role as a digital knowledge platform, highlighting the underlying issues of deception and manipulation that affect its credibility. They argue that despite Wikipedia's facade of an open, democratic space, it is susceptible to orchestrated content manipulation by anonymous actors who push specific narratives. These actions compromise the neutrality and factual accuracy of the information presented, leading to a distorted public perception. Furthermore, the authors discuss Wikipedia's reliance on a volunteer editing base that lacks diversity, primarily consisting of Western males, raising concerns about the inclusivity and representativeness of the knowledge it disseminates. Pillai and Verma's analysis is corroborated by the experiences of the Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM), which faced targeted misinformation and digital attacks, underscoring Wikipedia's vulnerability to exploitation by vested interests. This brief case study emphasizes the challenges of maintaining trust and authority in the digital age, where the power dynamics of information dissemination significantly impact our collective understanding of the world. Link : https://avim.org.tr/en/Yorum/AN-EXEMPLARY-FIGURE-IN-DIPLOMACY-AND-HISTORY-IN-MEMORY-OF-RETIRED-AMBASSADOR-BILAL-SIMSIR Web page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Telegram Channel: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://t.me/s/avimorgtr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Linkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ VKontakte: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vk.com/public202374482⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Youtube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Dailmotion: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instgram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction⁠

Geeta Pillai and Nitish Verma's essay critically examines Wikipedia's role as a digital knowledge platform, highlighting the underlying issues of deception and manipulation that affect its credibility. They argue that despite Wikipedia's facade of an open, democratic space, it is susceptible to orchestrated content manipulation by anonymous actors who push specific narratives. These actions compromise the neutrality and factual accuracy of the information presented, leading to a distorted public perception. Furthermore, the authors discuss Wikipedia's reliance on a volunteer editing base that lacks diversity, primarily consisting of Western males, raising concerns about the inclusivity and representativeness of the knowledge it disseminates. Pillai and Verma's analysis is corroborated by the experiences of the Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM), which faced targeted misinformation and digital attacks, underscoring Wikipedia's vulnerability to exploitation by vested interests. This brief case study emphasizes the challenges of maintaining trust and authority in the digital age, where the power dynamics of information dissemination significantly impact our collective understanding of the world. Link : https://avim.org.tr/en/Analiz/THE-DARKNESS-BEYOND-WIKIPEDIA-S-EXPOSED-FACE-EXAMINING-ITS-ROLE-IN-INFORMATION-MANIPULATION Web page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Telegram Channel: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://t.me/s/avimorgtr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Linkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ VKontakte: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vk.com/public202374482⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Youtube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Dailmotion: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instgram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction⁠

This analysis explores the European Union's (EU) enlargement policy, focusing on island of Cyprus, the Balkans, Moldova, and Ukraine. It examines the transition from a framework based on legal principles to one increasingly influenced by political pragmatism and strategic considerations. The study highlights how this shift raises questions about the EU's commitment to its foundational ideals and the consistency of its enlargement process. Greek  Cypriot Administration’s accession exemplifies the EU's unprincipled approach amidst complex geopolitical challenges, while the narrative of the Balkans reflects the EU's varied standards and strategic interests. The expedited accession of Moldova and Ukraine further illustrates the EU's shift towards a more responsive and strategically driven policy, contrasting with the experiences of other European aspirants. This analysis critically examines these developments, underscoring the potential long-term implications for the EU's integrity and foundational goals. It probes the consequences of prioritizing political and strategic objectives over legal and structural consistency, particularly regarding the EU's relations with Türkiye and its credibility within the Balkans. The study concludes by contemplating the EU's ability to sustain its role as a beacon of democratic ideals and legal standards amidst the complexities of contemporary geopolitics, urging introspection on the future trajectory of its enlargement strategy and global role. Link : https://avim.org.tr/en/Analiz/THE-EU-S-ENLARGEMENT-PARADOX-POLITICS-OVER-PRINCIPLES Web page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Telegram Channel: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://t.me/s/avimorgtr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Linkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ VKontakte: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vk.com/public202374482⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Youtube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Dailmotion: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instgram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction⁠

This analysis explores Türkiye's strategic role in the Black Sea, particularly in the context of the implementation of the 1936 Montreux Convention, against the backdrop of the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. The analysis examines Türkiye’s decision to deny passage to UK minehunter ships through the Bosphorus, highlighting its adherence to the provisions of the Montreux Convention and efforts to maintain regional stability. It delves into the geopolitical context and Türkiye’s position, scrutinizing its  commitment to the Montreux Convention since 1936 and its implications for naval passage control. The paper also presents various international perspectives on naval passage, encompassing viewpoints from the United States, the  United Kingdom, Ukrainian, and other international actors, thus providing a multifaceted understanding of the situation. A critical analysis of the strategic importance of naval assets in warfare, particularly the transfer of minehunter ships by the UK to the Ukrainian Navy, is discussed, emphasizing the broader Maritime Capability Coalition. The legal aspects underpinning Türkiye's application of the Montreux Convention are thoroughly examined, including interpretations of minehunters as warships and Türkiye’s regulatory role under the Convention. Furthermore, the paper assesses Ukraine's evolving reliance on international law, especially its previous appeals to the Montreux Convention, and projects the potential for escalation in the Black Sea in 2024. The study concludes by highlighting Türkiye’s as a custodian of regional stability, demonstrating its balanced approach in navigating international treaties and maritime law. This evaluation offers insights into the complexities of international law, diplomacy, and regional security dynamics in the Black Sea region. Link : https://avim.org.tr/en/Analiz/CAREFUL-MANAGEMENT-OF-THE-IMPLEMENTATION-OF-THE-1936-MONTREUX-CONVENTION-IN-A-DIFFICULT-AND-CHANGING-GEOPOLITICAL-ENVIRONMENT-OF-THE-BLACK-SEA Web page: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Telegram Channel: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://t.me/s/avimorgtr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://avim.org.tr/en⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Linkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/avimorgtr/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ VKontakte: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vk.com/public202374482⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Youtube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcIfEGNM3308QoLbCDJIFuw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Dailmotion: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.dailymotion.com/dm_0ea263f63bb5aee7d8770d1ec13cfe8b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instgram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/avimorgtr/IntroductionIntroduction⁠