Beyond the Page
Beyond the Page
Josh Olds
First Principles: A Conversation with John Kingston
51 minutes Posted Oct 11, 2020 at 8:15 pm.
0:00
51:05
Download MP3
Show notes
A while back, I had John Kingston on the podcast to talk about his book American Awakening. What I didn’t know was that the day we were talking, he was getting ready to launch a new collective called Christians Against Trumpism and Political Extremism. I must’ve made an impression, because a month later, I’m on the leadership committee and we’re working toward the long-term goal of reviving civil discourse.
I wanted to check in on John and hear about everything he’s been doing—the people he’s talking to, the projects he’s filming, and so on—and John was king enough to come back on the program and fill me in on the latest, including the First Principles Project. Listen to us talk about that, about Christians Against Trumpism, the problem of single-issue voting, his legal thoughts on Roe v. Wade, and more.
The Conversation | John Kingston
Josh Olds: I want to pick up that thread of talking about so many conservative evangelical white Christians being single issue voters. They’re vehemently pro-life. And you are as well, and I am as well, but we probably disagree on what should be done in order to get there. I know so many people who—especially after the first presidential debate last week—came away from that debate and went, “Yikes. But I’m gonna vote for him because he’s pro-life.? Like I get it, I really, really do. This is such an important issue. And unfortunately, Democrats don’t have a good history on this issue and currently don’t have great policies on this issue.
It’s so hard to get people out of that single-issue idea. Every single person who told me they were going to vote Trump, it came down to the issue of abortion. And again, I get it. But that’s only one facet of being pro-life, in my opinion. How do we get people to look beyond just being a single issue voter?

John Kingston: Yeah. Well, that is the nature of it all. The objective of Christians Against Trumpism is to call out where that is an inconsistent approach. David French had a beautiful piece in Time magazine yesterday, you know, saying that the idea of trumping a pro-life president is a farce, noting his deeply cavalier response to the loss of 200,000 American lives in the US in the COVID crisis and the way he handled it with his own staff…
[If you have] the most robust Christian understanding of this, then you would show the respect and dignity of all those around you, including those people work for you when you know that they’re imperiled by your own actions. It’s for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear: they will eventually see that the idea of Trump being pro-life president was a bit of a farce,
And yes, there are conservative judges, no doubt about that. Remember, I’m a lawyer and all that. I went to law school with some of these people that end up on these on these benches. And it matters, it really does matter. I’m not going to belittle the significance of having that. But I’m just going to tell you that, as wrongly decided as Roe versus Wade was…it’s not gonna be overturned. That’s just not where the judiciary is. And these folks that go to the Supreme Court are not just pro-life voting bots.
So invariably, people that want this to be the outcome are going to be disappointed, and they will sacrifice and compromise, all of our values and virtues of being a Christian…in order to get a bowl of porridge: a conservative judge who will v...