In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson examine polling data indicating growing support for socialism among Democrats, discuss competing definitions of socialism and capitalism, and debate whether historical examples such as China, the Soviet Union, Venezuela, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, and India offer lessons for modern America. They also address claims about Scandinavian countries, generational attitudes toward economic systems, and the role education, politics, and culture play in shaping those views. A new national poll showing Democrats view socialism more favorably than capitalism sparks a broader debate about economics, government power, and the direction of American politics. The results raise questions about how younger voters understand socialism, capitalism, and the historical record of both systems. The discussion centers on survey findings showing a significant gap between Democrats’ positive views of socialism and capitalism. From there, the conversation expands into the history of socialist and communist systems, arguments about economic freedom, and the political forces shaping public opinion today. Topics Covered: New polling on Democrats’ views of socialism versus capitalism Historical arguments involving China and the Soviet Union Venezuela, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, and India as case studies in the debate over socialism Differences between socialism, communism, and capitalist market systems The debate over Scandinavian countries and the welfare-state model Generational shifts in economic and political attitudes Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss the surge of state legislation aimed at limiting or restricting aspects of federal immigration enforcement, ongoing lawsuits challenging Trump administration immigration policies, and concerns about judicial rulings involving ICE detention cases. They also examine President Donald Trump's comments on border security, comparisons to immigration debates in Europe, and the political implications of immigration enforcement heading into future elections. The conversation focuses on the relationship between state governments, federal authority, and the courts, while arguing that legal challenges and judicial decisions have become a primary tool for opponents seeking to slow or block the administration's agenda. Blue state legislatures are advancing hundreds of immigration-related bills that supporters describe as protections for migrants and opponents argue are designed to obstruct federal immigration enforcement. The debate is quickly becoming a major political and legal battleground ahead of the midterm elections. At the center of the controversy are more than 240 state-level proposals, legal challenges to federal immigration policies, and growing disputes over the role of federal courts in shaping immigration enforcement. The episode examines how state governments, activist organizations, and the judiciary are influencing that fight.  Topics Covered: More than 240 state legislative proposals related to immigration enforcement Legal challenges targeting Trump administration immigration policies State efforts involving ICE operations, detention facilities, and federal enforcement President Trump's border security claims and immigration agenda Judicial rulings involving ICE detention cases across different administrations The political impact of immigration policy ahead of the midterm elections Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson examine newly reported details involving Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan and Troy Jackson in Maine, discuss media coverage of both races, review past records and public statements, and argue that these developments raise significant questions about the Democratic Party's Senate nominees in key states. New reporting on Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, drives this episode's discussion, as questions arise about an upcoming conference appearance, his past record in Detroit government, and the political implications for Democrats heading into the election cycle. The episode also examines new allegations involving Maine Senate candidate Troy Jackson and what the hosts argue these stories reveal about candidate vetting.The conversation centers on a series of reports involving Abdul El-Sayed, including his scheduled appearance at an event hosted by the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), criticism surrounding other conference participants, and renewed attention on his tenure overseeing Detroit's health department and animal control operations. The hosts also discuss public statements made by members of his family and what they believe those statements indicate about broader political and ideological trends. Topics Covered: Abdul El-Sayed's planned appearance at an ISNA conference in Detroit Debate over conference participants and controversy surrounding public criticism of the event Review of Detroit animal control euthanasia statistics during El-Sayed's tenure in city government Discussion of public comments and activism associated with members of the El-Sayed family Reports and allegations involving Maine Senate candidate Troy Jackson The hosts' critique of Democratic candidate selection and vetting in Senate races Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the Ben Ferguson podcast Ben examines reports that Air Force One was used as a decoy during a major security operation, discuss President Trump’s comments on ongoing negotiations with Iran, and analyze the administration’s insistence that Iran must never obtain a nuclear weapon. They also look at Democratic politics, including comments from former Representative Cori Bush about the Equal Rights Amendment, polling challenges facing Democrats, and debate surrounding policy proposals in New York City. New reporting on a presidential security operation has sparked debate about the seriousness of threats against President Donald Trump and the lengths U.S. officials will go to protect a sitting commander in chief. According to reports discussed in this episode, a credible threat tied to Iran led to an elaborate deception involving multiple aircraft and a covert departure from Turkey following a NATO summit. At the same time, the Trump administration says negotiations with Iran are underway while warning that military options remain on the table if diplomacy fails. The discussion centers on whether Tehran can be trusted, the future of Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and the role regional allies are playing in pushing for continued talks.  Topics Covered: Reports of a presidential security operation involving a decoy aircraft after a NATO summit Alleged Iranian threats against President Donald Trump Trump administration negotiations with Iran and nuclear concerns Potential military action versus continued diplomacy with Tehran Cori Bush and debate over the Equal Rights Amendment Democratic Party strategy, polling, and policy disputes ahead of elections Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the Ben Ferguson podcast we analyze Wisconsin's gubernatorial primary upset, debate what it reveals about socialist influence within the Democratic Party, examine new polling on the SAVE Act and voter citizenship requirements, discuss Michigan primary battles that highlight tensions between party leadership and Democratic Socialists, and review the latest developments involving Iran and the Trump administration's pressure campaign. A closely watched Democratic primary in Wisconsin delivered an upset that could shape the political conversation heading into the midterms. A Democratic Socialist candidate widely viewed as the favorite lost a statewide primary, raising questions about voter enthusiasm, polling accuracy, and whether progressive activists have reached their limits in key battleground states. At the same time, new polling shows strong public support for the SAVE Act, legislation requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections. According to the survey discussed in this episode, support remains high despite months of political attacks on the proposal. The episode also examines growing concerns among Democrats after several high-profile primary results in Michigan, where candidates backed by Democratic Socialist activists defeated establishment-favored opponents despite massive spending against them. Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson argue these races reveal a larger ideological struggle inside the Democratic Party. Finally, the conversation turns to Iran, with reports that a senior adviser tied to Iran's Revolutionary Guard suggested Tehran could seek to outlast the Trump administration in an extended confrontation with the United States. The hosts discuss escalating pressure on Iran, economic sanctions, and new reporting regarding threats against President Trump.   Topics Covered: Wisconsin Democratic primary and the defeat of a Democratic Socialist candidate Polling support for the SAVE Act and proof-of-citizenship voter registration requirements Michigan Senate primary and the victory of Abdul El-Sayed over establishment-backed candidates Growing influence of Democratic Socialists in Democratic Party primaries Iran's strategy toward the United States and the Trump administration Reports involving threats against President Trump and U.S. pressure on Tehran Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the Ben Ferguson show podcast, Ben examines allegations surrounding the reported “Round River” intelligence operation, discuss claims of politically divided disinformation classifications, review questions raised about FBI and intelligence community activities, and analyze a closely watched Wisconsin Democratic primary that Ferguson argues offers lessons about polling, turnout, and the growing influence of the Democratic Socialist movement. A newly publicized report about an alleged FBI and intelligence community operation known as “Round River” has sparked questions about how public figures were categorized during investigations tied to Russian disinformation and the Biden family Ukraine controversy. Ben Ferguson examines reporting that claims government agencies maintained lists that labeled some political figures and media organizations as either “targets” or “conduits” of disinformation. He discusses the release of documents by the White House Government Transparency Task Force, questions surrounding the Foreign Influence Task Force, and statements attributed to FBI Director Kash Patel regarding ongoing reviews and investigations. The episode also shifts to Wisconsin, where a Democratic gubernatorial primary produced an unexpected result. Ferguson analyzes the defeat of a Democratic Socialist candidate who had been viewed by many as the frontrunner and explores what the outcome could mean for Democrats, Republicans, and voter turnout in one of the nation’s most important battleground states.  Topics Covered: Allegations surrounding the reported “Round River” counterintelligence operation Claims that public figures were categorized as “targets” or “conduits” of disinformation Questions about the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force and internal reviews Document releases by the White House Government Transparency Task Force Wisconsin’s Democratic gubernatorial primary and the defeat of a Democratic Socialist candidate The role of polling, voter turnout, and battleground state politics ahead of future elections Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss challenges to current gender policies in women's sports, reactions to recent WNBA-related controversies, comments from public figures on athletics and gender identity, and the broader political implications surrounding these debates. They also examine remarks from Democratic candidates and progressive political figures on masculinity, football, religion, and cultural issues as campaigns for future elections begin to take shape. The WNBA's policies on gender eligibility are facing new scrutiny after former NBA players announced plans to declare for future WNBA draft eligibility. The debate has reignited broader questions about fairness in women's sports, competitive balance, and how athletic organizations define eligibility standards.At the center of the discussion are public challenges involving professional women's basketball, reactions from athletes and commentators, and growing pressure on sports leagues to clarify their policies. The conversation also expands into larger cultural and political debates about gender, athletics, and public discourse. Topics Covered: Former NBA players Enes Freedom Kanter and Royce White announcing plans to pursue WNBA eligibility Debate over gender eligibility standards in women's professional sports Clay Travis's public challenge involving the WNBA and high school basketball teams Criticism of progressive views on masculinity and football from Democratic candidates Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's positioning ahead of potential future national campaigns Religion, education, and faith-related comments by Democratic Senate candidates The Bottom Line: Senator Ted Cruz argues that current gender-identity policies in sports create conflicts that leagues will eventually be forced to address directly. He and Ben Ferguson also contend that several Democratic candidates are moderating or obscuring past positions as they seek broader electoral support Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the Ben Ferguson show podcast we review comments and campaign materials from candidates including Peggy Flanagan, Abdul El-Sayed, James Talarico, and Adam Hamilton. They discuss immigration policy, transgender medical treatments for minors, abortion laws, reparations, religion in public life, Sharia law, and the broader debate over Democratic socialism. Cruz and Ferguson also examine campaign strategy, voter messaging, and what they see as a growing effort by progressive candidates to gain national influence through Senate and statewide races.  A series of Democratic primary victories is raising new questions about the ideological direction of the Democratic Party and the candidates advancing to high-profile races. Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson examine several Senate and statewide candidates they describe as part of a growing Democratic socialist movement, focusing on their public statements, campaign messaging, and policy positions. The conversation centers on how these candidates present themselves to voters, whether their records match their current campaigns, and what their electoral success could mean for upcoming general elections. Cruz argues that a number of candidates are attempting to soften or obscure positions that he believes are outside the political mainstream.  Topics Covered: • Peggy Flanagan’s Senate campaign and her comments on immigration and transgender healthcare for minors• Abdul El-Sayed’s positions on Medicare for All, reparations, and religion in public life• The debate over late-term abortion laws and public opinion on abortion policy• Democratic Socialists of America and the influence of progressive candidates in elections• James Talarico, faith, education, and arguments about teaching the Bible in schools• Adam Hamilton’s comments on Christianity, salvation, and interfaith beliefs Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss James O’Keefe’s undercover reporting in Minnesota, the state’s voter-vouching rules, ongoing debates over voter identification requirements, Cruz’s support for election-integrity legislation, and the broader political arguments surrounding election security and voter confidence. A James O’Keefe undercover investigation in Minnesota reignites debate over voter verification, election integrity, and whether existing voting laws leave the system vulnerable to abuse. Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson examine footage from an undercover operation that tests Minnesota’s voter “vouching” system, a process that allows registered voters to verify the identity and residency of certain unregistered voters. The discussion focuses on concerns about election security, voter fraud, and the broader political implications of ballot access policies. The episode also expands beyond a single incident to consider a larger question: how candidates associated with the Democratic Socialists of America and other progressive movements continue to gain political traction. Cruz argues that deception and voter fraud are major factors in modern political campaigns, while Ferguson asks how voters should evaluate those claims and the systems surrounding election administration.  Topics Covered: James O’Keefe’s undercover investigation in Minnesota Minnesota’s voter-vouching system and election procedures Debate over voter ID requirements and election security Claims regarding voter fraud and election integrity Cruz’s support for the SAVE America Act Political implications for Democratic Socialists of America and progressive candidates Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz explains his decision to delete a prior episode after learning that an 82% miscarriage statistic tied to COVID vaccination claims was inaccurate. Ted and Ben discuss the underlying study, the subsequent correction, and their view that public officials should be held accountable for contradictory public and private statements. The discussion then turns to election integrity, voter registration policies in Minnesota, and a series of Democratic candidates running in Senate races across the country. The hosts examine positions on immigration, gender-related healthcare policies, abortion, religion, and campaign strategy, arguing that these races reveal significant ideological divisions heading into the election season. A correction to a widely discussed COVID vaccine statistic leads Ted Cruz to explain why a previous episode was removed and outlines the data issues behind a claim about miscarriage rates following vaccination during pregnancy. He argues that accuracy matters and walks listeners through the study, the criticism it received, and why the specific figure cited could not be supported.The conversation then shifts to the 2026 election landscape, with a focus on several Democratic Senate candidates and the policy positions that Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson describe as part of a broader ideological shift within the Democratic Party. Topics Covered: Correction and removal of a previous episode citing an inaccurate COVID vaccine miscarriage statistic Debate over public and private statements from Anthony Fauci regarding pregnancy-related vaccine concerns Minnesota voter registration and voter-vouching policies discussed through undercover reporting by James O'Keefe Senate candidate debates involving immigration, healthcare, and gender-related medical policies Arguments surrounding late-term abortion legislation and public opinion on abortion policy Religion, faith, and political messaging in several high-profile Senate campaigns The Bottom Line: According to Ted Cruz, correcting factual errors is essential to maintaining credibility, even when the broader argument remains unchanged. He and Ben Ferguson also contend that several Democratic Senate candidates represent a significantly more progressive ideological direction ahead of the upcoming elections. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.