The Supreme Court’s 2016 term may not have contained the usual number of blockbuster cases, but it did have its fair share of drama. Between the stonewalling
of Merrick Garland, the filibustered confirmation
of Neil Gorsuch, rumors
about Anthony Kennedy’s possible retirement, and in the background, the White House offensive
against the federal judiciary, court-watchers had no shortage of things to keep them up at night.
And so this week on Amicus,
we pour a couple of our favorite court-watchers a big cup of coffee and plop some microphones down at Slate’
s annual “Breakfast Table
.” Mark Joseph Stern
and Pamela Karlan
join us to discuss what we learned about the justices this term and what we can expect from them in the fall.
Transcripts of Amicus
are available to Slate Plus
members, several days after each episode posts. For a limited time, get 90 days of free access to Slate Plus in the new Slate iOS app. Download it today at slate.com/app
Please let us know what you think of Amicus
. Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook
. Our email is firstname.lastname@example.org
Podcast production by Tony Field.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices