The first Star Trek film is jokingly referred to as &quot;The Motionless Picture.&quot; While it made money, Paramount considered it a disappointment and it has a mixed legacy amongst Trek fans. It also has little in common with its sequels. Is that a good or bad thing? Patrick and Anton discuss. ___
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/72nZWQLXOJsxbkgpiqOffu
Twitter: https://twitter.com/WWIBpodcast
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wwib_official
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@whywasntitbetter
Email: wwibpodcast@gmail.com
 
Subscribe! Rate! Review! Tell a friend!

--- 

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/whywasntitbetter/message
Support this podcast: <a href="https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/whywasntitbetter/support" rel="payment">https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/whywasntitbetter/support</a>

Hannibal (2001)

Have you ever watched a movie you were excited for but felt disappointed in some way? Were you left wondering why it wasn't better? This is the podcast that has the answers! We review films that were highly anticipated, but were for a variety of reasons either disappointing, underachieving, or misunderstood, and ramble about why they weren't better. This is a podcast for film nerds and for anyone who enjoys some lighthearted, semi-serious, in-depth discussion.