Liz and Rebecca recap the case, which was discussed in Episode 1, and review the decision handed down by the Supreme Court at the end of June. They also discuss the impact this has for the separation of state and church moving forward. Background <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><a href= "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1088_dbfi.pdf"> SCOTUS Decision</a></li> </ul>   Check us out on <a draggable="false" href= "https://www.facebook.com/wedissentpodcast/" target="_blank" rel= "noopener nofollow">Facebook</a> and <a draggable="false" href="https://twitter.com/we_dissent" target="_blank" rel= "noopener nofollow">Twitter</a>. Our website, <a draggable="false" href= "https://we-dissent.org/" target="_blank" rel= "noopener nofollow">we-dissent.org</a>, has more information as well as episode transcripts.

Bonus Episode! Shurtleff v. City of Boston

We Dissent is a monthly law podcast hosted by two secular women, who are also attorneys at the Freedom From Religion Foundation and Americans United for Separation of Church and State. Join us as we discuss developments affecting the separation of church and state in the US Supreme Court and lower federal courts. We'll also explore other advocacy work we do to help atheists and other nonreligious people outside the courtroom. We know there are so many atheist podcasts and legal podcasts and you have a lot to choose from, but we hope you'll join us, the only legal podcast for atheists and agnostics hosted completely by women lawyers. We can't wait to start these conversations.