In a bizarre lawsuit, the city of Denver is taking on Big Tobacco, but not for the reasons you might think. This time, it's not about the health risks of smoking or the littering of cigarette butts, but rather the design choice of cigarette filters that don't break down in the environment.

In this episode, the speaker delves into the intricacies of the lawsuit, which argues that the city should be compensated for the costs of cleaning up cigarette butts that don't biodegrade. The city is suing nine tobacco companies, claiming that they knew or should have known that their filters would end up on the ground and cause harm to the environment. The speaker explores the city's case, which is built on a 1979 report and a 1996 survey that found 96% of smokers admitted to throwing butts on the ground.

The lawsuit has some strong arguments, particularly when it comes to the harm caused by cigarette filters clogging storm drains and leaching arsenic and nicotine into waterways. However, the speaker also points out that the city's case is not as clear-cut as it seems, and that the city may be overreaching by suing the tobacco companies for the costs of cleaning up cigarette butts that are already being swept up as part of regular street maintenance.

The speaker also touches on the broader implications of the lawsuit, including the potential for it to set a precedent for other companies that produce non-biodegradable products. If the city wins, it could lead to a new wave of lawsuits against companies that produce plastic waste. But if the city loses, it could set a precedent for companies to argue that they shouldn't be held responsible for the environmental impact of their products. To hear more about this fascinating case and its potential implications, tune in to this episode.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.