My thinking, over the years, on hiring freelancers and other people with nonpermanent status has really changed a lot over time. I used to be of the opinion that I wanted to hire lifers, people who are in it for the long haul, people who could develop deep company knowledge and really kind [I think the first is that hiring freelancers is a really great way to run experiments. They might [When you test them out, you don't have to permanently commit to spending a certain amount of money per year. You don't have to invest in recruiting like you otherwise would. You don't have to invest in health insurance, but most importantly, you can pivot. If you run an experiment and it works, then perhaps you double down on that experiment or you decide to scale it, and that [When it comes from everything to branding to SEO to writing to all kinds of different tasks, I think now I'm much more likely to hire a freelancer to test and [Then, if that works, maybe we move to a full-time position or maybe, and this often happens, that the freelancer does bring a lot of success, but they bring success around something that only needed to be executed once over a period of three months, or with a lot of marketing things, someone [Yeah, so my thoughts have really changed on this. I've also found that [[transcript truncated due to character count restrictions]Website: https://nomics.comCrypto Market Data API: https://nomicsapi.comPersonal Twitter: https://twitter.com/ClayCollinsCompany Twitter: https://twitter.com/NomicsFinance--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nomics/support