There's a proposal called BIP-110 that almost nobody in the mainstream is talking about. And I think it matters more than the price, more than the MSTR drama, more than the ETF outflows.BIP-110 proposes a one-year temporary soft fork that would restrict certain types of data from being embedded in Bitcoin transactions — targeting Ordinals, inscriptions, BRC-20 tokens, and Runes. The stated goal is to clean up block space and reinforce Bitcoin's monetary purpose.I actually agree with the frustration behind it. But I hold a stronger belief — Bitcoin's rules should not change because a group of people, however well-intentioned, decide they don't like how others are using the network.In this video I cover:What BIP-110 actually proposesThe history of Bitcoin Improvement Proposals and why this one is differentThe case FOR restricting inscriptionsWhy the precedent argument is the most dangerous partThe chain split risk heading into August 7th 2026Where I actually land on all of thisNote: I refer to Jameson Lopp as "James Lopp" in the video — his name is Jameson Lopp. The quotes and positions attributed to him are accurate.#Bitcoin #BIP110 #Ordinals #BitcoinEducation #BitcoinConsensus #CryptoDebate #BitcoinNews #BTC #SelfCustody #BitcoinPhilosophy