<h1>Episode Notes</h1>
Ok, we are back with more Stephen King nonsense. I guess if you make changes, sometimes the author is ok with it. But only if it is extra sad? Sorry, Kubrick, apparently you are no Frank Darabont.
Topics include:
-Joe Hill v Stephen King
-The Walking Dea
-&quot;Oh god noooooo&quot;
-Thomas Jane being a limited actor
-Bad special effects
Join us for THE MIST before you see THE LONG WALK!
<a href="https://x.com/popcasestudy" rel="nofollow">Follow the show on Twitter</a>
<a href="https://www.instagram.com/popcasestudy/" rel="nofollow">Follow the show on Instagram</a>
<a href="https://letterboxd.com/Daveagiannini/" rel="nofollow">Follow Dave on Letterboxd</a>
<a href="https://x.com/bywillbjarnar" rel="nofollow">Follow Will on Twitter</a>
<a href="http://x.com/darnthatdave" rel="nofollow">Follow Dave on Twitter</a>
Find out more at <a href="https://pop-culture-case-study.pinecast.co" rel="nofollow">https://pop-culture-case-study.pinecast.co</a>

#358 – LA Confidential and Pragmatism (Him)

Pop Culture Case Study is a movie podcast, of course, but  far from one that merely reviews films old and new. Though they are sure to don their critical hats in every episode, hosts David Giannini and Will Bjarnar view fresh and classic cinematic offerings through a psychological lens, with Dave using his background as a therapist and counselor to analyze a psych-centric theme. 

The duo also details their varying anticipation levels for each new film, and what makes their chosen rewatch something worth revisiting (or, you know, never watching again). New episodes drop every Friday, but until then, they’ll be here, diagnosing your favorites, and judging you for what you watch.