EIDOS DISPLAY, LLC v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION
Decided <a href="https://patentnoise.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/14-1254-opinion-3-6-2015-11.pdf">March 10, 2015</a>
Argued <a title="November 6, 2014" href="http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx?fl=2014-1254.mp3" target="_blank">November 6, 2014</a>

<audio class="wp-audio-shortcode" id="audio-47-1" preload="none" style="width: 100%;" controls="controls"><source type="audio/mpeg" src="http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx?fl=2014-1254.mp3&#038;_=1" /><a href="http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx?fl=2014-1254.mp3">http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx?fl=2014-1254.mp3</a></audio>

IN RE: SINGHAL
See <a title="March 6, 2015" href="https://patentnoise.wordpress.com/2015/03/09/roxane-laboratories-inc-v-camber-pharmaceuticals-inc/">Here</a>.