Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer just said the quiet part out loud. After six days and about 36 hours, the jury is still stuck — and Kevin Reddington says one juror “refuses to listen to the law.” The judge even framed it as one juror against the other 11. That is 11-1. Watch this first. Twice the panel told Judge William Sullivan they could not agree. He sent them back. He read the dynamite charge. Then the forewoman’s note pointed to a holdout who would not follow the reasonable-doubt instruction. Reddington asked the judge to remove that juror. Sullivan said no — he would not “side with one juror or the 11.” He asked each of them if they could follow the law, defined reasonable doubt again, and sent them home for a seventh day.Pat also covered: Nancy Grace walks through the actual Clancy trial facts — not the spin Don Lemon tries to turn the Clancy case into a race story: “What if she were black?”  Labor Day gas just hit a record — AAA says $4.14 a gallon, the highest ever for this weekend HBO dropped a new "Harry Potter" trailer — and it actually looks good We’re going to take Canada seriously — not because anyone has invasion plansShould a juror who will not follow the law stay on this panel? If this ends 11-1 and a mistrial, do you call that justice — or a stall?If you want unfiltered truth and commonsense analysis that cuts through the noise, hit subscribe and turn on notifications.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices