The Lindsay Clancy jury just told the judge they are deadlocked. After nearly 18 hours, they still cannot agree on whether a Massachusetts mother murdered her three children. The judge sent them back in. Pat opened the phones and asked you what you think. Lindsay Clancy is charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and 8-month-old Callan. The defense says postpartum psychosis, a pile of psychiatric medications, and a command hallucination. Prosecutors say she planned it: She sent her husband out for a prescription and takeout, then used exercise bands. Supporters in pink shirts showed up arguing that she is sick, not guilty. A hung jury does not settle that fight. It just hands it to the rest of the country. That is why Pat took calls instead of reading another legal explainer. Regular people are not sitting in that Plymouth courtroom. They still have to decide what they believe about responsibility, mental illness, and what we owe three children who never got a vote.Pat also covered: After a 9-woman jury deadlock on Lindsay Clancy, is the 19th Amendment back on the table? A U.N. committee says countries are “legally obliged” to consider slavery reparations. “Baby canceled” posts are treating abortions like gender-reveal announcements.Did the jury stall because the facts are messy or because the culture no longer wants to call this murder? If you had to vote today — guilty, not guilty by reason of insanity, or mistrial — which way do you go, and why?If you want unfiltered truth and common-sense analysis that cuts through the noise, hit subscribe and turn on notifications.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices