Show notes
Interview with Dave Neary of Red Hat, concerning OPNFV and its relationship with Open vSwitch. Topics include:
- The difference between SFC and NFV.
- Importance performance constraints in NFV.
- Telcos and NFV, and how telcos approached OpenStack.
- How OPNFV bridges the telcos with OpenStack.
- What telcos care about, and a definition of “carrier grade.”
- Why carrier-grade features matter to everyone.
- Downsides and tradeoffs of carrier grade, such as cost and complexity.
- Role of Open vSwitch in OPNFV, and why DPDK is important to NFV.
- Importance of short 64-byte packets in NFV, e.g. for RTP (Real-time Transport Protocol, for delivering audio and video across networks).
- Relationship between SIP and RTP.
- Status of DPDK datapath in OVS for OPNFV (still under OpenStack review and in early evaluation, not running in production much).
- Importance of
vhost-userfor NFV. - Why DPDK API/ABI changes cause trouble for Open vSwitch and downstream users, and how symbol versioning in DPDK 2 and later helps.
- Problems caused by irregularly scheduled Open vSwitch 2.4 and 2.5 releases.
- Intent to branch OVS 2.6 in July.
- SFC for OPNFV demo with Tacker.
- Progress toward NSH support in OVS, and why OVS support for Geneve should make it easier now.
- Geneve standardization progress.
- OpenFlow matching for service chains.
- Potential pros and cons of NSH and Geneve for service chaining.
- VPP and OPNFV, and guesses at pros and cons of VPP versus OVS for different application.
- Why Dave is excited about OPNFV.

