Many think that vaccine mandate litigation only includes quacks as plaintiffs and attorneys. Like employment and personal injury attorneys, those who represent anti-vaxxers are painted with a broad brush, often negative. But our guest today doesn’t neatly fit into a box. Scott Street is a credible litigator with a successful history in high-stakes litigation (we worked on a 100M case together); we were in the same law class at Loyola Law School and have been active in democratic politics for years. But he has been at the forefront of the fight against vaccine mandates and other related litigation. In this episode of LawFlip, we discuss why. We discuss vaccine mandates, how the Covid vaccine compares to other vaccines, how hypocritical politicians on both sides have been, and we each give our take on the Russia/Ukraine crisis. Check out this episode everywhere podcasts play.
Mentioned Today:
- Analysis: Putin's Ukraine assault confounds Biden strategy, puts leadership to the test
- LA free to fire unvaxxed firefighters
- Covid News: Several Parts of U.S. Ease Mask Rules
- The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects
- Trump’s Truth Social’s disastrous launch raises doubts about its long-term viability
- 2 Prosecutors Leading N.Y. Trump Inquiry Resign, Clouding Case’s Future
- Abbott orders state agencies to investigate gender-affirming care for trans kids as child abuse
- Scott J. Street | Contributor for The Federalist
Connect With LawFlip
Check out:
Support the show