Here as our nation is about to celebrate its 250th year, we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning a quote one of the SCOTUS justices provided raising concerns about plea deals replacing jury trials and how it might have caused concerns to the framers of the U.S. Constitution in the matter styled as Hunter vs. United States (addressing appellate waivers).Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. No legal advice is offered or intended here.

#Idaho4

#HuntervUS

#IdahovKohberger

#SCOTUS