Here, we proffer pure opinions, commentary, speculation and a discussion of the key factors and arguments Mr. Kohberger would need to raise in any ineffective assistance of counsel argument in violation of the Idaho State Constitution seeking post-judgment relief (Caution:

This is a hypothetical exercise intended to discuss SCOTUS case law such as Garza v. Idaho, Hunter v. United States, and Strickland v. Washington, there is no indication at the present time Mr. Kohberger intends to appeal his convictions or sentences). Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states: Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#Idaho4

#IdahovKohberger

#HunbervUS

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress