Back in 2013, I was approached by a prominent Christian movie producer about working with them on a new major project. It seemed like a wonderful opportunity that was right up my alley. But as we discussed the project further, it became clear that they were pushing a watered-down, milquetoast version of the Gospel that was meant to ease people into the faith."We can't just walk around with hypodermic needles full of fire and brimstone and hope to reach people," he told me. "Sometimes it's best to feed them Flintstones Vitamins of the Bible so we can ease them into the faith."I wholeheartedly disagreed and did not join the project. We parted friends and I wished them the best, but I am much more of a fire and brimstone kind of guy, at least when it comes to spreading the truth. The Bible is wonderful as it is. We don't need to water it down. They produced their series and it was very successful. I could only watch some of it because they accomplished their mission of putting out a very safe telling of the Biblical narrative.The reason I bring this up is that we are faced with similar arguments being made about the Covid jabs. There is thankfully a growing number of Americans who are starting to see parts of the truth. Most importantly, they're realizing they've been lied to from the start, that the vaccines are neither safe nor effective, and the powers-that-be seem to have an agenda that doesn't really tie into healthcare other than using it as a vehicle for their machinations.There are three camps of vaccine skeptics in America today. The first camp is somewhat indifferent. They aren't getting jabbed or if they already have been, they're not getting the boosters. But otherwise, they don't talk about it. They take on the "buyer beware" attitude that releases them from being compelled to tell anyone what they know about the jabs.The second group is the largest. Most of you who are reading this or listening to the latest episode of End Medical Tyranny fall into this category. You're willing to share some of the truth such as VAERS data or lack of efficacy studies. You may even occasionally share some of the more controversial topics such as the belief that Covid and the jabs are two parts of a bioweapon. But the "crazy" stuff isn't worth sharing even if you believe some or all of it.I totally understand the thinking of people in this camp. It's a strategic choice to focus on what's mostly demonstrable rather than speculative. You believe if you tell people that there have been over a million adverse reactions reported to the CDC, you have the database to prove it. But if you say something like the jabs can induce acquired immune deficiency syndrome, you may lose their attention. They may start thinking you're a wacko conspiracy theorist. You may blow the opportunity to change a heart and mind.In other words, you believe in using the Flintstones Vitamins version of sharing vaccine skepticism. I hold zero grudges towards you if you're in that camp. In fact, you may actually be right in your strategy. My experience is different, but that's anecdotal.For me, I want to spread everything we know. I want to tell them about the long conversation I had with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny about vaccine shedding last May. Why? Because this May, vaccine shedding was proven. It sounds crazy to think that people who are heavily vaccinated may be shedding some elements of their injections, or possibly the reactions from the body itself, onto the people around them. But just because it sounds crazy doesn't mean it's not true, nor does it mean we shouldn't be sharing it.There are lines. I'm not in favor of sharing every theory that pops up. I assess each one and determine whether or not it's viable. If it seems possible, I'll explore further. If it then seems likely, I'll share it. Sometimes, I'll pass on sharing information until I can get more corroboration. For example, I haven't talked about the "snake venom" theory. It may be real, but I haven't...