Show notes
Connecting to Christian van Nieuwerburgh’s idea of “joyful effort” and discussions at the University of Graz Research Culture Campus Fest about supportive, inclusive research cultures and prioritizing meaningful work over productivity, this episode revisits an episode from January 2025 on research identity, meaningful work, and funding. I explore the tensions between our autonomy to pursue intrinsically motivating, value-driven research and systemic constraints such as funding calls, promotion criteria, shifting national priorities, and restrictive deliverables that can conflict with participatory principles. Using examples from Katta Spiel on focusing on what you want to do not what is strategic, Mark Reed’s impact principle about purpose, and Stuart Reeves on low-cost research styles, I talk about our choices to play or not play the funding “game,” including reframing proposals, and the risks of taking on less-meaningful projects. I close with reflective questions (summarized in nine steps by Rachel Ratz-Lubashevsky) to identify what “lights you up” and guide decisions.00:34 Motivating the Relevance of Revisiting this Episode04:56 Rachel's Summary of the 9 Simple Steps to What Lights You Up08:28 Introduction and Reflection on Academic Freedom09:56 Replay from Katta Spiel Part 110:40 Mark Reed's principle for engagement and impact13:23 The Tension Between Personal Values, Identity and Systemic Expectations15:07 The Reality of Funding Proposals and Strategic Game16:40 The Impact of Funding Conditions on Research18:27 The Dilemma of Playing the Funding Game21:07 Choices for How to Play the Game27:52 Choosing Not to Play the Game29:42 Reframing Research Identity and ConclusionRelated Links:Uni Graz Research Culture Campus Fest report and LinkedIn post about itRachel Ratz-Lubashevsky’s LinkedIn post summarising the 9 stepsCAL Podcast episodes I mention:Christian van Nieuwerburgh, Johanna Stadlbauer, Katta Spiel part 1, Mark Reed and Stuart Reeves part 1
