What happens after the Supreme Court says parents have a religious right to opt their children out of public school instruction that conflicts with their religious beliefs?In this episode, we unpack Alan L. v. Lexington Public Schools, one of the first federal court decisions to apply the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Mahmoud v. Taylor. The case began when the father of a kindergartener sought to opt his son out of curriculum addressing sexual orientation, gender identity, and family structures. When the school district rejected his requests as overly broad, the dispute quickly made its way to federal court.We explore how the court applied Mahmoud, why its interpretation may significantly expand the reach of that decision, and the difficult questions schools now face about identifying objectionable curriculum, providing parents notice, and administering religious opt-outs. Mahmoud may have announced a constitutional right, but Alan L. shows just how unsettled its boundaries remain.Check out our updated website (www.chalkandgavel.com) to sign up for our newsletter, support the show, find our episode database, and grab some merch. Interested in staying up to date on education law as an educator? Check out ELA's publication, Law and Policy in Schools, at www.educationlaw.org/lapis.Chalk & Gavel is supported by the Martha McCarthy Education Law & Policy Institute at Indiana University’s School of Education. The McCarthy Institute offers virtual and in-person programming to increase legal literacy. Educators, school leaders, attorneys, policymakers, professors, and others are invited to participate in interactive discussions related to contemporary issues in education law. To learn more, visit https://education.indiana.edu/events/conferences/mccarthy-institute/index.html#EducationLaw#EducationLaw #SchoolLaw #SupremeCourt #ReligiousFreedom #ParentalRights