Geoengineering is becoming more normalized by the day, and it seems like it may be heading towards a "when" not an "if". With increasing arguments for using it, the arguments against it (and pleas for slowing down its progress) are being largely ignored. Will it result in "termination shock"?

IOM3 | Geoengineering study points to Amazon carbon gains

Solar geoengineering could shield up to 75% of oceans from heat waves

Recent Solar Geoengineering Developments Highlight Dangers of Normalization and Need to Advance Non-Use - Center for International Environmental Law

The US barely bothers to track geoengineering. What could go wrong? | Grist

‘Termination shock’: trust our expert warnings on geoengineering’s planetary risks | Raymond Pierrehumbert, Julia Slingo, Michael Mann and Valerie Masson-Delmotte | The Guardian

Please join us on Patreon for weekly bonus content and to join our Discord community.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.