Show notes
Episode SummaryDr. DiGiorgio returns from testifying before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health, the third in a series of hearings on healthcare costs covering the provider landscape. The two break down the major policy levers discussed in his testimony — site-neutral payment, Stark Law reform, physician-owned hospitals, and Certificate of Need laws — and why so many obviously good solutions remain politically untouchable. They also dig into the rural access gap, the failure of the NP independence experiment to solve it, Medicare Advantage risk adjustment, and the new HHS healthcare advisory committee. As always, the diagnosis is clear; the politics are the hard part.Chapter Markers0:00 – Welcome back & Dr. DiGiorgio's Congressional testimony3:16 – Site-neutral payment: why everyone knows it's right and no one acts6:26 – You can't do site neutrality without also enabling competition8:20 – How MedPAC's methodology actually works11:50 – Stark Law explained — and why it creates a double standard14:32 – Hospice fraud, Armenian gangs, and Nick Shirley20:30 – The original sin: third-party payment and utilization control23:52 – The case for allowing physician referral networks25:15 – Hospitals' self-referral hypocrisy and the Federation of American Hospitals tweet28:52 – How Section 6001 of the ACA banned physician-owned hospitals30:13 – The new HHS healthcare advisory committee — will it matter?37:44 – The rural access gap: how big is the problem really?42:52 – Why NP independence didn't solve rural shortages47:58 – International medical graduates and the rural fiction50:06 – Let prices rise: the market solution to rural primary care55:25 – Medicaid federal matching rates and state competitiveness56:38 – How Democrats and Republicans engaged at the hearing58:57 – The politics of why nothing gets doneLinks:YouTube Dr. Digiorgio Congressional Testimony: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjPr3fK9jjcWritten Testimony@anish_koka | @drdigiorgio@drsloungepod🎧 Spotify | Apple Podcasts | YouTube