– Intro + podcast review + episode setupFallen Angels* 2:30 – Overview: premise, Coward context, and adaptation choices* 7:00 – Plot breakdown: Julia, Jane, and the return of Maurice* 13:00 – Tone & critique: “pleasant but slight” comedy, lack of stakes* 18:00 – Performances: Kelli O’Hara & Rose Byrne’s comedic chemistry* 22:30 – Design & direction: David Rockwell’s set, pacing issues* 26:00 – Standout moments: drunk scene, physical comedy, audience payoff* 28:30 – Tony Awards outlook: acting locks, design strength, revival chancesBeaches* 31:00 – Overview: from novel to musical, long development history* 34:00 – Plot breakdown: Cece & Bertie’s lifelong friendship* 38:00 – Score & writing critique: generic lyrics, lack of character specificity* 42:00 – Structural issues: weak storytelling, unclear character arcs* 45:00 – Performances: Jessica Vosk (Cece) & Kelli Barrett (Bertie)* 47:30 – Design & staging problems: scale, visuals, and pacing* 49:00 – Tony Awards outlook + final verdict on both showsListener discussion questions* Can a “lightweight” comedy like Fallen Angels still feel essential theater, or does it need stronger stakes to justify a Broadway revival?* What makes a stage musical adaptation succeed where others—like Beaches—struggle to translate emotional impact?* When performances are strong but the material is weak, how much should that factor into awards recognition? This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bwaybreakdown.substack.com